| Course | NURS 753 Psychotherapeutic Theories, Frameworks, and Modalities (NURS753) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 7 |
| Assignment | Case Analysis Evaluation 3 on Depression With Narcissistic Personality Disorder |
| Paper type | Case analysis evaluation (assessment, diagnosis, therapeutic intervention and treatment plan, at least 5 references) |
| Length | about 1,507 words, 5 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: a case analysis of a chronic mental health symptom covering assessment, diagnosis, therapeutic intervention and treatment plan, applying evidence-based psychotherapy, with at least 5 references in current APA format, which may include the course textbook |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| Points | 100 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | DNP |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 7 in Liberty's published NURS 753 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NURS 753 Week 7
Passed Over After the Merger: A Case Analysis of Depression in a 47-Year-Old Sales Director With Narcissistic Personality Disorder and a Psychotherapy Plan Built Around the Alliance
[Student Name]
School of Nursing, Liberty University
NURS 753: Psychotherapeutic Theories, Frameworks, and Modalities
Case Analysis Evaluation 3
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The patient is a composite written as a model case; the diagnostic manual, textbook and studies cited are real.
Passed Over After the Merger: A Case Analysis of Depression in a 47-Year-Old Sales Director With Narcissistic Personality Disorder and a Psychotherapy Plan Built Around the Alliance
Case Presentation
Mr. K., a 47-year-old regional sales director, came at the urging of his primary care nurse practitioner after four months of low mood, irritability, poor sleep and fatigue. The problems began when his company merged with a competitor and he was passed over for vice president in favor of a younger colleague from the other company, then moved to a smaller territory. He describes the decision as "a joke" made by people "who have no idea what I built," and spends hours each evening replaying meetings and composing emails he does not send. He has stopped going to the gym, sleeps poorly, has lost interest in golf and feels "flat and furious at the same time." His wife told him that if he did not get help she would move out; he says he came "to prove I'm fine." Twice, after being corrected in a team meeting, the thought came that his family and team might do better if he were gone; these faded within a day.
He has no previous psychiatric treatment, drinks two glasses of wine most nights, more since the merger, and has no history of mania or substance use disorder. His wife describes a long pattern of needing to be the most accomplished person in the room, difficulty hearing criticism, expecting special treatment from staff and family, and little patience for others' problems, alongside generosity when he is admired and real devotion to their two teenage children.
Assessment
Interview and Measures
The first interview required care. Mr. K. began by listing his achievements and questioning whether a nurse practitioner was qualified to treat him. Rather than defend my credentials, I reflected how painful it must be to have built something and feel it taken away, which changed the tone of the conversation. He scored 17 on the PHQ-9, which falls in the moderately severe band. He met criteria for depressed mood and anhedonia for more than two weeks, with insomnia, fatigue, poor concentration and feelings of worthlessness that he expressed as rage at others rather than self-blame. His AUDIT-C score was 4, indicating drinking to monitor.
Suicide Risk
He reported passive thoughts of death on two occasions, each triggered by a humiliation at work and resolving within a day, with no plan, intent or past attempts. He owns no firearms. Risk factors include middle-aged male sex, recent occupational loss, increased drinking and a pattern of shame-triggered ideation; protective factors include his children, his marriage and his wish to "come back." This pattern matters: in a comparison of 61 outpatients with narcissistic personality disorder and depressive symptoms and 56 depressed patients without personality disorder, the narcissistic group showed reactive, fluctuating depression with hostile, accusatory rumination toward others and suicidal ideation triggered by external events, rather than melancholic features (Fjermestad-Noll et al., 2019). We completed a safety plan with his wife's participation.
Personality Assessment
Over two sessions and with his wife's account, I reviewed personality features against DSM-5 criteria. He described and demonstrated a grandiose sense of self-importance, preoccupation with success, a belief that he should associate only with high-status people, a need for admiration, entitlement, limited empathy and arrogance, seven of the nine criteria, present since early adulthood and across work and family settings.
Diagnosis
| Diagnosis | For | Against |
|---|---|---|
| Major depressive disorder, single episode, moderate | Depressed mood and anhedonia over four months; five or more symptoms; PHQ-9 of 17 | None |
| Adjustment disorder with depressed mood | Clear stressor; reactive quality | Full criteria for a major depressive episode are met |
| Bipolar II disorder | Grandiosity | Grandiosity is enduring, not episodic; no hypomanic episodes |
| Alcohol-induced depressive disorder | Increased drinking | Depression preceded the increase; drinking below disorder threshold |
| Narcissistic personality disorder | Seven of nine criteria, longstanding and pervasive | Should be confirmed over time, since depression can color self-report |
Mr. K. meets DSM-5 criteria for major depressive disorder, single episode, moderate, and for narcissistic personality disorder (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). The personality diagnosis was not shared in the first session; it was discussed later in terms of patterns he recognized, such as how criticism affects him, consistent with concern about stigma and how diagnosis disclosure is handled in this population (Dimaggio et al., 2026).
Therapeutic Intervention
Formulation
Mr. K.'s self-esteem has rested on achievement and admiration. The demotion removed both, exposing a vulnerable sense of worth beneath the grandiose surface. He defends against shame with anger at others and rumination about injustice, which keeps the injury alive, while withdrawal from the gym, golf and friends removes sources of reward and deepens the depression (Wheeler, 2014). Any clinician who questions or corrects him risks becoming the next person who has humiliated him.
The State of the Evidence
Treatment of the depression rests on strong evidence for cognitive behavioral approaches and antidepressants. Treatment of narcissistic personality disorder does not. An international group of personality disorder experts concluded in 2026 that the field urgently needs empirically supported treatments and cautioned against treating a recent trial as a benchmark because of serious methodological concerns (Dimaggio et al., 2026). Early work is encouraging: in a feasibility study of a group psychoeducation program for 25 patients with pathological narcissism, attendance averaged 83% with one dropout, satisfaction was high and self-reported grandiosity decreased, although participants reported strong emotional activation and a need for individual support, and the design could not show causation (Blay et al., 2026). The plan therefore treats the depression with established methods and adapts them to his personality.
Alliance First
The first target is the relationship. In sessions 1 to 3 I will acknowledge his competence and losses, collaborate on goals he values, return to work at the level he wants, a calmer home and better sleep, and agree on how we will handle moments when he feels criticized by me. Ruptures will be named and repaired openly: when he dismisses a suggestion or becomes angry, I will ask what felt wrong and acknowledge my part. With this patient, the moment he feels insulted by the therapist is not a detour from treatment; it is the treatment.
Sixteen-Session Plan
Sessions 4 to 8 use behavioral activation: scheduling the gym, golf with a friend and time with his children, with weekly monitoring of activity and mood. Sessions 6 to 12 add cognitive work focused on rumination and on the belief that his worth depends on rank, using thought records about specific meetings and behavioral experiments such as asking a colleague's opinion in a meeting and noting the outcome. Sessions 9 to 14 address interpersonal patterns at work and home: what happens when he feels slighted, how others respond and what he might do differently, using examples from his week and from our sessions. Two couples sessions, at sessions 7 and 13, give his wife a role and address how his anger affects the family. Sessions 15 and 16 focus on relapse prevention, including plans for future setbacks at work. If he is interested after the depression lifts, I will offer referral to a group psychoeducation program or longer-term therapy focused on personality patterns.
A Sample Rupture and Repair
In session 5, Mr. K. arrived angry that I had suggested in the previous session that his colleagues might not have been trying to humiliate him. "You sound like HR," he said. I acknowledged the impact first: "It sounds like you felt I was taking their side, and that I missed how much that meeting hurt." He agreed. I asked what I could have done differently, and he said that he needed me to understand before I questioned anything. We agreed that when I offer another view, I will first say what I understand about his experience. He then said, more quietly, that the meeting had made him feel "like nothing." That statement, made only after the repair, opened the most productive work of the session on the shame beneath his anger.
Strengths and Barriers
His strengths include intelligence, persistence, a long record of achievement, love for his children and a wife who has not given up on him. Barriers include his discomfort with being a patient, his tendency to leave when he feels criticized and a work schedule full of travel. We arranged telehealth sessions on travel weeks and agreed that he can tell me directly when a session feels like criticism, rather than canceling the next one.
Medication
Given moderately severe depression, I recommended a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor alongside therapy. He was initially reluctant to "need a pill," which we reframed as a tool athletes and executives use to recover. He agreed, along with reducing wine to no more than one glass on weeknights, since alcohol worsens sleep and mood.
Treatment Plan and Evaluation
Goals are a PHQ-9 below 10 by week 12 and below 5 by week 16, return of sleep and interest in activities, resumption of full work functioning and fewer evening arguments, measured by a weekly log he and his wife complete together. The PHQ-9 and suicide screening are repeated at every visit, the AUDIT-C monthly and the safety plan reviewed after any humiliating event at work. Medication response is assessed at four and eight weeks. If he drops out, which is common, a letter will invite him back without blame. At week 8, we will review together whether the plan is helping, using his log and scores, so that he has a voice in any change of course rather than experiencing it as a verdict.
Conclusion
Mr. K. has major depressive disorder triggered by a professional loss and shaped by narcissistic personality disorder, with angry rumination and shame-triggered suicidal thoughts. The plan treats the depression with behavioral activation, cognitive work and an SSRI, places the alliance and its repair at the center because of his personality, involves his wife and is honest that treatment for narcissistic personality disorder itself remains without established evidence.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
Blay, M., Benmakhlouf, I., Speranza, M., Duarte, M., & Ronningstam, E. (2026). Feasibility and acceptability of a group psychoeducation program for patients with pathological narcissism with or without a diagnosis of narcissistic personality disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 32(4), 166-173. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000940
Dimaggio, G., Inchausti, F., Bateman, A., Bo, S., Choi-Kain, L., Lind, M., Luyten, P., MacBeth, A., Juul, S., Kealy, D., Sharp, C., & Weinberg, I. (2026). Can all oxygen molecules accumulate in one corner of the room? Treating pathological narcissism requires high standard randomized clinical trials: A commentary on the trial by Mohajerin et al. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 33(4), Article e70319. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.70319
Fjermestad-Noll, J., Ronningstam, E., Bach, B., Rosenbaum, B., & Simonsen, E. (2019). Characterological depression in patients with narcissistic personality disorder. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 73(8), 539-545. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2019.1664630
Wheeler, K. (Ed.). (2014). Psychotherapy for the advanced practice psychiatric nurse: A how-to guide for evidence-based practice (2nd ed.). Springer Publishing.
What the NURS 753 Week 7 instructions ask
The third and final Case Analysis Evaluation arrives in Module/Week 7 of NURS 753, when readings cover depressive and anxiety disorders and the DSM-5 section on personality disorders, along with Wheeler's chapters on psychotherapy with complex presentations. The format follows the first two analyses: an assigned case taken through assessment, diagnosis, an evidence-based psychotherapeutic intervention and a treatment plan for a chronic mental health symptom, with five or more references in current APA, the course textbook allowed among them. The same week carries the second WebEx presentation, so the case analysis should be drafted early. Personality pathology adds a challenge: the psychotherapy must be adapted to the person, not only to the disorder.
How this NURS 753 Week 7 example is built
The analysis opens with the case: a sales director sent by his primary care nurse practitioner after four months of low mood, irritability and poor sleep following a demotion in a corporate merger. Assessment covers the interview, the PHQ-9, a suicide risk assessment, a structured look at personality features and his wife's account. A differential separates major depression from adjustment disorder, bipolar II disorder and alcohol-related mood symptoms, and the personality features are weighed against DSM-5 criteria. The therapy section explains the formulation, why the alliance is the first target, a sixteen-session plan using behavioral activation and cognitive techniques, a plan for ruptures, medication and how progress will be measured.
NURS 753 Week 7 grading rubric: where the points go
Graders apply the rubric used for the earlier two analyses: the depth of assessment, the reasoning of the differential and DSM-5 diagnosis, the choice and fit of an evidence-based psychotherapy, a concrete description of the intervention, a complete treatment plan with measures and APA and references. With personality pathology, instructors also want candor about what the research cannot yet support, attention to the therapeutic relationship and its ruptures, and a respectful tone that avoids moralizing about the patient. Suicide risk assessment is expected whenever a depressed patient reports thoughts of death, along with a safety plan that fits how this patient's thoughts arise.
NURS 753 Week 7 help: mistakes that cost points
Cases that involve personality disorders tend to go wrong in one of two ways. Some treat the depression as if the personality were irrelevant, then wonder why the patient drops out after the third session. Others write about the personality disorder in judgmental terms and never treat the depression. Treat what the patient came for, adapt the therapy to how he relates to others, and plan for the moments when he will feel criticized by you. Be accurate about the evidence: say what is established for depression and what remains uncertain for narcissistic personality disorder. Describe the patient's behavior, not his character. A brief example of a rupture and how you would repair it shows the grader that the alliance plan is more than a phrase.
Related NURS 753 sample papers
Other NURS 753 weeks
- NURS 753 Week 1: Mental Health Policy Paper
- NURS 753 Week 2: Evidence-Based Article Review
- NURS 753 Week 3: WebEx Class Presentation 1
- NURS 753 Week 4: Case Analysis Evaluation 1
- NURS 753 Week 6: Case Analysis Evaluation 2
More DNP sample papers
- NURS 721 Week 7: Group Electronic Presentation
- NURS 732 Week 7: Quality Improvement Plan: Part II
- NURS 750 Week 7: Servant Leadership Paper
- NURS 751 Week 7: WebEx Class Presentation 3
NURS 753 Week 7 questions, answered
What is NURS 753 Case Analysis Evaluation 3?
The final case write-up of the course, set in Module/Week 7 and worth 100 points, in which a research-backed therapy is fitted to an assigned case, from evaluation and diagnosis to a full plan.
Where can I find a free NURS 753 Week 7 sample paper?
The full NURS 753 Week 7 case analysis of depression with narcissistic personality disorder, with its differential table, sixteen-session plan and sources, is open to read here at no cost.
How does depression differ in narcissistic personality disorder?
One study found depression in NPD tends to be reactive and fluctuating, with hostile rumination toward others and suicidal ideation triggered by external events, rather than melancholic.
Is there an evidence-based treatment for narcissistic personality disorder?
Not yet; experts note that no psychotherapy is empirically established for NPD, though psychoeducation and adapted therapies show early promise and co-occurring depression responds to standard treatment.
Why is the therapeutic alliance important in treating narcissistic patients?
Patients with narcissistic vulnerability often experience the clinician's questions or corrections as criticism, so ruptures are frequent and repairing them openly keeps the patient in treatment.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom NURS 753 Week 7 sample · All NURS 753 weeks · All courses