| Course | HLTH 350 Introduction to Public and Community Health (HLTH350) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 7 |
| Assignment | Article Review 4 |
| Paper type | Article review |
| Length | about 484 words, 2 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: a 450-500 word individual APA paper that summarizes the major points of an assigned peer-reviewed article and suggests ways to address its problem, with 1 supporting source |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| Points | 80 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | BS in Public Health |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 7 in Liberty's published HLTH 350 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HLTH 350 Week 7
Bringing Mental Health Care Into the Primary Care Office: A Review of the Evidence for Collaborative Care
[Student Name]
School of Health Sciences, Liberty University
HLTH 350: Introduction to Public and Community Health
Article Review 4
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The article reviewed is a real peer-reviewed review chosen for this sample; the article embedded in the course may differ.
Bringing Mental Health Care Into the Primary Care Office: A Review of the Evidence for Collaborative Care
Introduction
Most people with depression or anxiety never see a psychiatrist. They are treated, if at all, by their primary care provider, who may have a few minutes per visit and no time to track whether treatment is working. Archer et al. (2012) reviewed the evidence for collaborative care, a model designed to close that gap. The question matters for community health because depression is one of the leading causes of disability, and untreated depression worsens the course of chronic diseases such as diabetes and heart disease.
Summary
In collaborative care, a care manager, usually a nurse or social worker, partners with the patient's usual primary care clinician, while a psychiatrist reviews cases and advises from the background. The care manager tracks symptoms, supports the patient and alerts the team when treatment needs to change. The authors combined 79 randomized trials involving 24,308 participants. Compared with usual care, collaborative care led to significantly greater improvement in depression in the short term, medium term and long term, up to about two years, though the benefit was not clear beyond that. Anxiety improved too, and patients took their medications more consistently, rated their mental quality of life higher and were more satisfied. The trials varied in risk of bias and in how the model was delivered, but the benefits held across many settings and countries, which makes the overall conclusion more trustworthy than any single study.
Suggestions to Address the Problem
McKenzie et al. (2012) describe community mental health services as underfunded and separated from the rest of the health care system, and they explain that the structure of the system shapes what care patients receive. Collaborative care works within that structure by bringing mental health expertise into primary care rather than sending patients elsewhere. Three suggestions follow. First, insurers and Medicaid programs should pay for care management time, since the model depends on work that traditional office visits do not cover. Second, health systems and community health centers should train nurses and social workers as care managers. Third, programs should start in practices serving low-income patients, who face the longest waits for specialty mental health care. The size of the possible benefit is large. In a trial of 1,801 older adults, Unützer et al. (2002) found that 45% of patients in collaborative care had their depression symptoms reduced by half or more after a year, compared with 19% in usual care. The psychiatrist does not have to see every patient; the system only has to make sure someone notices when a patient is not getting better.
Conclusion
The evidence shows that collaborative care improves depression and anxiety where most patients are treated. Paying for the model and training its workforce would let community health systems reach far more people than specialty care alone. Because the benefit faded after about two years in the review, programs should also plan for long-term follow-up, so patients who improve are not lost once active care management ends.
References
Archer, J., Bower, P., Gilbody, S., Lovell, K., Richards, D., Gask, L., Dickens, C., & Coventry, P. (2012). Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012(10), CD006525. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006525.pub2
McKenzie, J. F., Pinger, R. R., & Kotecki, J. E. (2012). An introduction to community health (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Unützer, J., Katon, W., Callahan, C. M., Williams, J. W., Jr., Hunkeler, E., Harpole, L., Hoffing, M., Della Penna, R. D., Noël, P. H., Lin, E. H. B., Areán, P. A., Hegel, M. T., Tang, L., Belin, T. R., Oishi, S., Langston, C., & IMPACT Investigators. (2002). Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 288(22), 2836-2845. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.22.2836
What the HLTH 350 Week 7 instructions ask
HLTH 350's writing ends with Article Review 4, submitted as the seventh module/week closes, once students have read McKenzie's eleventh chapter on community mental health and thirteenth on how the health care system is built, along with a presentation and an assigned article. As with the earlier reviews, students summarize the major points of an assigned peer-reviewed article and suggest ways to address the problem it raises, citing one supporting source, in APA format at 450 to 500 words. Only the Final Exam remains after this review, in the shortened final module/week that closes on Friday. A study of how mental health care is organized fits both chapters and lets students propose realistic changes to the system.
How this HLTH 350 Week 7 example is built
The sample review opens with the problem the article addresses: most people with depression or anxiety are seen in primary care, where their conditions often go untreated or undertreated. The summary explains what collaborative care is and reports the review's size and main findings for depression and anxiety, including the finding that benefits did not persist into the very long term. A suggestions section draws on the chapters to recommend paying for collaborative care through insurance billing codes, training care managers and starting in practices that serve low-income patients. A landmark trial of older adults adds a concrete example of the size of the benefit. The conclusion summarizes why the model deserves wider use.
HLTH 350 Week 7 grading rubric: where the points go
The final article review in HLTH 350 is graded like the others on an accurate summary of the article, suggestions that address its problem, use of the assigned chapters, a 450 to 500 word length and correct APA formatting with the supporting source. As the last review, it is a chance to show the course's full development, especially in explaining a complex study, such as a systematic review, in plain language and in proposing suggestions that are specific and realistic. Instructors value reviews that connect a mental health finding to the structure of the health care system, since the chapters pair those topics deliberately. Careful proofreading also matters on the final submission.
HLTH 350 Week 7 help: mistakes that cost points
Identify what kind of article you are reviewing, such as a single trial or a systematic review, and explain it simply, since a review that pools many studies needs a sentence about what was pooled. Summarize the most important findings with numbers. Let the mental health chapter show why the problem matters, and use the system chapter to locate where change would have to happen. Offer two or three specific suggestions, such as payment changes, workforce training or where to start. Include one limitation. Respect the word range and cite in APA style, and after submitting, turn to preparing for the Final Exam.
Related HLTH 350 sample papers
Other HLTH 350 weeks
- HLTH 350 Week 1: Discussion Board Forum 1
- HLTH 350 Week 2: Article Review 1
- HLTH 350 Week 3: Discussion Board Forum 2
- HLTH 350 Week 4: Article Review 2
- HLTH 350 Week 5: Discussion Board Forum 3
- HLTH 350 Week 6: Article Review 3
More BS in Public Health sample papers
HLTH 350 Week 7 questions, answered
What is HLTH 350 Article Review 4?
It is the course's last review, worth 80 points, in which students boil an embedded journal article down to fewer than 500 APA-styled words and propose remedies for the problem it describes.
Where can I find a free HLTH 350 Week 7 sample paper?
Here is the whole HLTH 350 Week 7 article review, of a Cochrane review of collaborative care for depression and anxiety in primary care.
What is collaborative care for depression?
It is a team model: a care manager follows each patient's symptoms, the primary care clinician prescribes and a psychiatrist advises on cases that are not improving, so treatment is adjusted until it works.
Does collaborative care work?
A Cochrane review of 79 trials with 24,308 participants found collaborative care improved depression and anxiety outcomes compared with usual care for up to about two years.
What is left in HLTH 350 after Article Review 4?
Only the Final Exam, forty open-book questions on Modules/Weeks 5 through 8, which must be completed by Friday of the final module/week.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom HLTH 350 Week 7 sample · All HLTH 350 weeks · All courses