| Course | BUSI 750 Managing Human Resources (BUSI750) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 5 |
| Assignment | Discussion Board Forum 3 |
| Paper type | Doctoral discussion thread with replies |
| Length | about 872 words (thread and replies). Course guide: the course guide posts the forum's word counts, reply rules and rubric inside the course; this sample uses a thread of about 575 words and two replies of about 140 words each, with current APA citations |
| Format | APA 7 citations and reference list |
| Points | 75 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | DBA |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 5 in Liberty's published BUSI 750 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for BUSI 750 Week 5
Discussion Board Forum 3: Thread and Two Replies
BUSI 750 Managing Human Resources, Discussion Board Forum 3 (thread and two replies)
Thread by [Student Name]
The prompt, the veterinary group and the classmates are composites standing in for the course's own; the books and the published research are real; the week, points and readings follow Liberty's public course guide for BUSI 750, which posts the forum's own instructions inside the course.
Our veterinary hospital group employs about 210 credentialed veterinary technicians across 14 hospitals. In exit interviews, nearly every departing technician says some version of the same thing: they love the animals and the work, but they cannot build a life on the pay or see where the job leads. The median technician leaves us after about five years, often for human health care or for work outside medicine entirely. Our retention problem is, in an important sense, a calling problem.
Hardy's third chapter provides the starting point. Having traced how the Reformers restored dignity to ordinary occupations, Hardy (1990) turns to the practical question of how a person should choose a career. His answer weighs two things together: the gifts a person has been given and the needs of the neighbors those gifts can serve. A technician who is good with frightened animals and anxious owners, who can place a catheter in a cat's vein and calm a family deciding about euthanasia, has made exactly the kind of choice he describes. Research supports the value of such choices. Duffy and Dik (2013), reviewing a decade of studies, found that a sense of calling is consistently linked with job satisfaction, commitment to one's career and a sense of meaning in life, though they caution that most of the evidence is correlational.
The difficulty is that a calling can be used against the people who have one. Bunderson and Thompson (2009), studying zookeepers, found that those with a strong sense of calling identified deeply with their work and found broad meaning in it. They also found that these keepers saw the work as a moral duty and were more willing to give up pay, personal time and comfort for it. A calling, in their phrase, is a double-edged sword, and the edge that cuts the worker is the one an employer is tempted to sharpen. Our pay structure quietly assumes that technicians will accept less because they love the work.
A Christian view of calling should forbid that assumption. If Hardy is right that a calling is a way of serving neighbors with one's gifts, then the employer is also called to serve the people who work for it, not to collect their devotion at a discount. Keller and Alsdorf (2012) make a related point when they argue that work has dignity because people bear God's image; the dignity belongs to the worker, not only to the task. An organization that benefits from its employees' sense of calling therefore takes on an obligation to make that calling sustainable.
Career development is the most practical way to meet that obligation. I am proposing a four-step technician ladder for our group. Technician I is the entry credential. Technician II requires two years and demonstrated competence in a defined skill set, such as anesthesia monitoring or dental radiography. Technician III requires a Veterinary Technician Specialist credential in an area such as emergency and critical care, which we would fund. Technician IV is a lead or teaching role responsible for training newer technicians. Each step would bring a defined pay increase, and veterinarians would be expected to delegate the tasks that credential holders are qualified to perform, so the work itself grows with the title. The ladder answers both of Hardy's questions: it develops the technician's gifts and widens the service those gifts provide. We will know it works if the median tenure rises and if exit interviews stop citing a lack of a future.
Reply to Hannah
Hannah, your thread on teacher retention in your district describes the same pattern I see in veterinary medicine: people who entered the work as a calling and leave because the calling no longer pays the rent. Your proposal for a mentor-teacher stipend is a good step, and the research supports it, because it rewards experienced teachers for the skill they have built and gives newer teachers a reason to picture a long career in the district rather than a few hard years before leaving. Bunderson and Thompson (2009) would warn, though, that districts can come to rely on teachers' sense of duty to fill gaps, such as unpaid coverage of classes and after-school supervision. Does your district track how many unpaid hours its teachers absorb? If so, reducing that number might do as much for retention as the stipend, and it would show teachers that the district is not treating their devotion as free labor.
Reply to Isaac
Isaac, your description of the pastoral staff at your church, who work long weeks for modest salaries because they feel called, raises the hardest version of this question. I agree with you that a pastor's sacrifice can be a faithful choice, and Hardy (1990) would not want us to turn every calling into a market transaction. Duffy and Dik (2013) also note that living out a calling, not merely having one, is what links it to well-being. I wonder whether your church has asked its staff whether they are living out their calling or simply enduring it. A confidential annual conversation about workload, family time and development could help the board distinguish sacrifice the staff choose from sacrifice the church has quietly come to expect, and the answer might change how the board sets salaries and sabbatical policy.
References
Bunderson, J. S., & Thompson, J. A. (2009). The call of the wild: Zookeepers, callings, and the double-edged sword of deeply meaningful work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 32-57. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.32
Duffy, R. D., & Dik, B. J. (2013). Research on calling: What have we learned and where are we going? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), 428-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.06.006
Hardy, L. (1990). The fabric of this world: Inquiries into calling, career choice, and the design of human work. Eerdmans.
Keller, T., & Alsdorf, K. L. (2012). Every good endeavor: Connecting your work to God's work. Dutton.
What the BUSI 750 Week 5 instructions ask
Module/Week 5 brings the third forum, worth 75 points, with Hardy's third chapter, Mello chapters 6 and 8 and one presentation; no other assignment falls in the week, since Module/Week 4 carries only readings. Liberty's public course guide names the four forums and refers students to the course for each prompt, length rule, rubric and due date, so the wording a student sees there controls. The readings make career choice and career development the natural subject. Hardy moves from the history of vocation to the question of how a person should choose work, and a doctoral forum can ask what that means for the organizations that employ people who believe they have been called.
How this BUSI 750 Week 5 example is built
The thread opens with the veterinary group's numbers: technicians who love the work, earn far less than nurses with similar training and leave after about five years. It then presents Hardy's guidance on choosing a career by gifts and by service to neighbors, and Duffy and Dik's review linking calling to satisfaction and meaning. Bunderson and Thompson's zookeeper study supplies the warning that a calling can lead people to accept sacrifice and an employer to expect it. The thread argues that a Christian view of calling forbids treating devotion as a discount and recommends a four-step technician ladder with credential support and pay tied to skills. One reply questions a teacher-retention plan; the other asks about a church's pastoral staff.
BUSI 750 Week 5 grading rubric: where the points go
Readers of this forum will look for an argument that takes the idea of calling seriously from both sides, as a source of meaning and as a possible route to exploitation. The research should be reported accurately, including the limits of qualitative and correlational studies, and Hardy's view of career choice should be stated in his own terms rather than replaced with a general sentiment about purpose. A recommendation should follow from the analysis and show how career development, pay and job design fit together. Replies should engage a classmate's case and add a fresh source or question. The course posts the rubric internally, so check its criteria before posting.
BUSI 750 Week 5 help: mistakes that cost points
Calling is an attractive subject that can slide into inspiration without analysis. Keep it grounded: describe a real group of employees, what they believe about their work and what the organization does in response. Use at least one study that shows a cost of calling as well as a benefit, so the argument is balanced. Distinguish what an employee chooses to sacrifice from what an employer asks of them. When you recommend career development, name the steps, the skills at each step and the reward, because a vague promise of growth is what calling-driven employees eventually stop believing. In replies, ask about the classmate's specific setting, and suggest one measure they could track.
Related BUSI 750 sample papers
Other BUSI 750 weeks
- BUSI 750 Week 1: Forum 1: Strategic HRD
- BUSI 750 Week 2: Forum 2: Vocation and Development
- BUSI 750 Week 3: Individual Paper: Transfer
- BUSI 750 Week 6: Team Paper: Picker Job Redesign
- BUSI 750 Week 7: Forum 4: Evaluating Programs
- BUSI 750 Week 8: Strategic HRD Research Proposal
More DBA sample papers
- BUSI 700 Week 5: Group Forum 3: You Are Not So Smart
- BUSI 760 Week 5: Dissertation Prospectus: Stalled CI
- BUSI 815 Week 5: Case Study: Three Family Firms
- BUSI 820 Week 5: Forum 5: Correlation and Regression
BUSI 750 Week 5 questions, answered
What does BUSI 750 Discussion Board Forum 3 ask?
The third of four forums, worth 75 points, falling in Module/Week 5 alongside Hardy's chapter on career choice and Mello chapters 6 and 8; the exact prompt and rubric are given inside the course.
Where can I find a free BUSI 750 Week 5 sample paper?
You are on it: a BUSI 750 Week 5 forum on career development for veterinary technicians who see their work as a calling, plus replies about teachers and pastors.
Can a sense of calling be harmful at work?
Bunderson and Thompson found that zookeepers with a strong calling found deep meaning in their work but were also more willing to sacrifice pay, time and comfort, which employers can exploit.
What does Hardy say about choosing a career?
In his third chapter Hardy turns from history to practice and asks readers to choose work by weighing their own gifts and the real needs of their neighbors, not by status or income alone.
Is BUSI 750 Module/Week 4 graded?
No. The course guide lists only readings from Keller and Mello and one presentation for Module/Week 4, with no assignment due, which gives students time to start the team paper and the proposal.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom BUSI 750 Week 5 sample · All BUSI 750 weeks · All courses