| Course | BUSI 435 Small Business Entrepreneurship (BUSI435) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 2 |
| Assignment | Discussion Board Forum 1 Replies |
| Paper type | Two discussion replies |
| Length | about 506 words (thread and replies). Course guide: at least two replies of 250 words each to classmates' Forum 1 threads, substantial, thoughtful and critical |
| Format | APA 7 citations and reference list |
| Points | 50 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | BS in Business Administration |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 2 in Liberty's published BUSI 435 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for BUSI 435 Week 2
Discussion Board Forum 1 Replies: What Makes an Entrepreneur
BUSI 435 Small Business Entrepreneurship, Discussion Board Forum 1 Replies
Thread by [Student Name]
The two classmates and their threads are composites; the textbook and the research cited are real, and the structure follows Liberty's public course guide for BUSI 435.
Reply to Jordan
Jordan, you argued that a business plan is a waste of time for a small startup because the market will change the plan anyway, and you are right that many plans are written once for a bank and never opened again. The research suggests, though, that planning itself can help when it shapes early decisions. Delmar and Shane (2003) tracked Swedish startups from their first months; founders who wrote a plan before most other startup steps were less likely to give up on the venture and got their product and organization built faster. Planning, in their account, helped founders make decisions and coordinate actions efficiently.
Brinckmann et al. (2010) combined many studies and found a positive overall relationship between business planning and performance in small firms, with the effect depending on context, for example stronger for established small firms than for brand-new ones. A plan is valuable when it is a working tool for deciding what to test first, not a document produced to impress a lender.
That suggests a middle path for your example of a lawn care startup: a short plan that lists the key assumptions, such as how many customers will sign up for weekly service, and the cheapest way to test each one, updated every month. Scarborough (2016) treats the feasibility analysis as exactly that kind of early test. Research also cautions that planning helps most when it is revisited, so the two-page plan should be reviewed after each test rather than filed away. It would also give a lender or partner something concrete to review. Would a two-page plan like that change your view?
Reply to Brianna
Brianna, I agree that passion matters, and your example of a family restaurant whose owners worked eighty-hour weeks through a difficult first year shows how commitment can carry a business through early setbacks. I want to complicate one assumption in your thread, though: that a business that closes has failed. Headd (2003) studied new employer firms using Census Bureau data and found that many closed businesses were successful at the time they closed; their owners closed them to retire, to pursue other opportunities or because they had reached their goals, not because the businesses were losing money. Closure and failure, in other words, are different outcomes.
This matters for how we judge passion. A passionate owner may keep a struggling business open long after the evidence says to stop, losing savings that could fund a better idea. Scarborough (2016) describes the entrepreneurial mind as combining commitment with a realistic tolerance for risk, and passion works best when it is paired with clear signals for when to change course. In your restaurant example, the owners might have set specific measures, such as monthly sales or cash on hand, that would tell them whether to keep going, adjust the menu or sell. Passion supplies the energy to keep going, and measures supply the judgment about where to go, so the two work best together. How do you think the owners decided they could keep going through that first year?
References
Brinckmann, J., Grichnik, D., & Kapsa, D. (2010). Should entrepreneurs plan or just storm the castle? A meta-analysis on contextual factors impacting the business planning-performance relationship in small firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 24-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.10.007
Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2003). Does business planning facilitate the development of new ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 24(12), 1165-1185. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.349
Headd, B. (2003). Redefining business success: Distinguishing between closure and failure. Small Business Economics, 21(1), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024433630958
Scarborough, N. M. (2016). Essentials of entrepreneurship and small business management (8th ed.). Pearson.
What the BUSI 435 Week 2 instructions ask
Module/Week 2 has no new chapters; students review chapters 1 through 4 of Scarborough with a presentation, post the Forum 1 replies for 50 points, take Quiz 1, worth 75 points, and send the individual portion of the feasibility analysis to their group. Each student replies to at least two classmates' threads, each reply at least 250 words, and the best replies treat the classmate's thread as an argument to be tested rather than a post to be praised. The guide's standard for discussion, substantial, thoughtful and critical, applies to replies as much as to threads, so a reply should test or extend a classmate's argument rather than simply agree. Research is required for threads but not specified for replies; citing a study still strengthens a reply's critique.
How this BUSI 435 Week 2 example is built
Each reply engages a classmate's specific claim, tests it with evidence and suggests a refinement. Reply one honors a classmate's doubts about planning, then shows from a startup panel study and a meta-analysis when plans pay off, and proposes a two-page working plan instead. The second accepts the classmate's emphasis on passion and complicates the definition of success with research showing that many business closures are voluntary and that owners often regard closed firms as successful. Both replies connect their points to Scarborough's discussion of feasibility and the entrepreneurial mind and close with questions that invite further discussion. Each reply names the classmate's claim before testing it.
BUSI 435 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go
Replies in BUSI 435 are graded on whether they reach 250 words each, address at least two classmates and contribute substantial, thoughtful and critical discussion, the same standard the guide sets for threads. A strong reply brings the classmate a study, a counterexample or a tighter definition they lacked, and uses Scarborough's terms correctly. Critical does not mean harsh: a reply that respectfully questions a claim and offers evidence contributes more than one that agrees. Since a feasibility analysis is due next week, tying a classmate's idea to testing demand is especially apt. Replies that only praise a thread earn little, however polite.
BUSI 435 Week 2 help: mistakes that cost points
Choose two threads with a claim you can test, such as a strong opinion about planning or passion. Begin by restating the classmate's point fairly. Bring a source or example the classmate lacked and show what it changes. Each reply must clear 250 words; finish with a question, and skip replies that do nothing but compliment. Use Scarborough's terms precisely. Post the replies before taking Quiz 1, since reviewing chapters 1 through 4 for the replies doubles as quiz preparation, and coordinate with your group so the individual feasibility portion reaches them on time. Reply to classmates whose topics differ from yours, which widens what you learn before the quiz.
Related BUSI 435 sample papers
Other BUSI 435 weeks
- BUSI 435 Week 1: Forum 1 Thread
- BUSI 435 Week 3: Feasibility Analysis
- BUSI 435 Week 4: Forum 2 Replies
- BUSI 435 Week 5: Forum 3 Thread
- BUSI 435 Week 6: Business Plan
- BUSI 435 Week 7: Forum 4 Thread
- BUSI 435 Week 8: Forum 4 Replies
More BS in Business Administration sample papers
- BUSI 430 Week 2: Forum 1 Thread and Reply
- BUSI 431 Week 2: Essay 1: Ethics and Buying Centers
- BUSI 436 Week 2: Marketing Plan Outcome Paper 1
- BUSI 439 Week 1: Group Case 1: Cart Abandonment
BUSI 435 Week 2 questions, answered
What are the BUSI 435 Forum 1 replies?
A pair of 250-word answers to Forum 1 posts, 50 points in the course's review week, each meant to test the classmate's argument.
Where can I find a free BUSI 435 Week 2 sample paper?
A complete BUSI 435 Week 2 pair of replies appears below, on whether small startups should write business plans and on whether business closure means failure.
Does writing a business plan help a startup?
Research on new ventures found that planning before launching activities was associated with better survival and faster development, especially when the plan guided decisions, though effects vary by context.
Is closing a business the same as failing?
No. Research on new employer firms found that many owners who closed their businesses considered them successful at closure, since owners close firms to retire, sell or pursue other opportunities.
What else is due in BUSI 435 Module/Week 2?
Quiz 1, 75 points across 25 open-book questions with an hour allowed, plus each student's share of the feasibility analysis, sent to the group.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom BUSI 435 Week 2 sample · All BUSI 435 weeks · All courses