BUSI 431 Week 8 Sales Plan Project Analysis Example

Reviewed by Thomas Kerrigan, MBA, CPA · Liberty University · Updated

This BUSI 431 Week 8 sample is the Sales Plan Project Analysis, the individual review each student writes of another group's completed plan. It examines a composite plan for an office furniture dealer selling to growing companies, praising its specific prospecting system and its adaptation of the presentation to different buyers, then offering two pieces of substantive feedback: its territories are drawn by geography without checking workload, which research on territory alignment suggests leaves sales on the table, and its plan for keeping accounts after the sale is thin for a business whose largest opportunities come from repeat orders as clients expand. Each point is tied to the textbook's chapters and to scholarly research, and each ends with a specific suggestion the group could adopt. Liberty University BUSI 431 grades the analysis at 55 points, the last major item for BS in Business Administration students before the course closes Friday.

CourseBUSI 431 Sales Management and Professional Selling (BUSI431)
Module/Week8
AssignmentSales Plan Project Analysis
Paper typeWritten analysis of a classmate group's sales plan
Lengthabout 407 words (thread and replies). Course guide: an analysis of at least 350 words reviewing 1 other group's Sales Plan Project with relevant, insightful feedback, in Microsoft Word with college-level writing, in current APA format
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points55
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBS in Business Administration
Where it sitsModule/Week 8 in Liberty's published BUSI 431 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BUSI 431 Week 8

1

Sales Plan Project Analysis: Review of the Lakeside Office Furniture Plan

BUSI 431 Sales Management and Professional Selling, Sales Plan Project Analysis

Thread by [Student Name]

The other group's plan and its company are composites; the textbook and the research cited are real, and the structure follows Liberty's public course guide for BUSI 431.

Why this part earns its pointsThe analysis summarizes the plan first so the feedback is judged against the group's own goal.
2

The plan I reviewed was written for Lakeside Office Furniture, a dealer selling furniture and workspace design services to companies of 50 to 500 employees that are expanding or moving offices. Its goal is to grow revenue by 15 percent through 30 new corporate accounts, using three representatives in a metropolitan area. The plan follows the textbook's sequence closely and is clearly written.

Two strengths stand out. First, the prospecting system is specific and practical. The group uses commercial lease filings and hiring announcements as leads, because companies that sign new leases or hire rapidly will need furniture, and qualifies them by timeline and budget, which applies Castleberry and Tanner's (2019) qualification criteria well. Second, the presentation section adapts to different buyers: facilities managers see installation timelines, finance officers see total cost and leasing options, and executives see design renderings that reflect company culture.

Why this part earns its pointsEach improvement is supported by research and paired with a fix the group can adopt.
3

My first suggestion concerns territories. The plan divides the metropolitan area into three geographic zones of roughly equal size. Size, however, is not workload. The downtown zone contains most of the large employers and most of the leads, while the suburban zones contain fewer, smaller prospects. Zoltners and Lorimer (2000) report that misaligned territories, some swamped and some thin, are widespread, and that fixing alignment can lift sales with the same headcount. I would recommend that the group count accounts and qualified prospects in each zone, weight them by potential, and redraw the boundaries so each representative has a comparable workload, perhaps giving one representative a smaller downtown area.

My second suggestion concerns the after-sale section, which is one paragraph. For a furniture dealer, the largest opportunities often come from repeat business as client companies keep growing, adding floors or opening new offices. Palmatier et al. (2006) found that relationship investments and the trust and commitment they build drive customer loyalty and seller performance. A plan that wins a growing company once and then disappears gives the next expansion to whichever competitor stayed in touch. I would add quarterly check-ins with each account's facilities manager, an annual workspace review and a system for tracking clients' lease expirations and hiring.

Overall, this is a strong, realistic plan whose prospecting and presentation sections could be used as written. With workload-based territories and a fuller retention program, it would also capture the growth that its best accounts will create. Would the group consider using its lease-filing data to track existing clients as well as new prospects?

4

References

Castleberry, S. B., & Tanner, J. F., Jr. (2019). Selling: Building partnerships (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. R. (2006). Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 136-153. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.4.136

Zoltners, A. A., & Lorimer, S. E. (2000). Sales territory alignment: An overlooked productivity tool. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 20(3), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2000.10754234

What the BUSI 431 Week 8 instructions ask

The final week assigns chapter 17 of Castleberry and Tanner, on managing a sales career, with a presentation, the Forum 4 replies worth 20 points, the Sales Plan Project Analysis worth 55 and Quiz 8. Each student picks one other group's finished plan and writes, in Word and APA style, a review of at least 350 words offering feedback that is substantial, relevant and insightful. Because every student has just finished a full plan, the analysis is a chance to apply the whole course to someone else's work. Because BUSI 431 shuts on Friday of Week 8, the review should be finished well before then.

How this BUSI 431 Week 8 example is built

The analysis follows the structure of a professional review. It opens by summarizing the plan's goal and strategy so the reader knows what is being evaluated. Two strengths come next, each tied to a chapter concept so the praise is specific. The core of the review offers two improvements, each with evidence: the territory design is checked against research on alignment, and the after-sale section is checked against research on relationship marketing. Each recommendation is concrete enough for the group to act on. The analysis closes with an overall judgment and a question for the group. References in APA format follow, as the guide requires.

BUSI 431 Week 8 grading rubric: where the points go

The analysis is graded on how carefully the student read the other group's plan, how relevant and insightful the feedback is, whether it reaches 350 words, and whether it shows college-level writing in current APA format in a Word document. Instructors look for feedback grounded in the textbook's concepts and in research, rather than general praise or criticism. A review that identifies specific strengths and specific gaps, explains why they matter and suggests realistic improvements demonstrates mastery of the course. A respectful, professional tone matters, since the group will read the analysis, and supporting a criticism with evidence makes it easier to accept and use.

BUSI 431 Week 8 help: mistakes that cost points

Read the whole plan before writing, and note where it follows the textbook sequence well and where it is thin. Start with a short summary, then name two strengths with the chapter concepts they reflect. Choose one or two improvements that matter most rather than listing every flaw. Support each with the textbook or a scholarly source and suggest a specific fix. Write as a teammate would, frank and generous. Reach 350 words, format the document in APA with references, and write it in Word. Submit it by midweek; the Forum 4 replies and Quiz 8 compete for the same days before Friday's close. Ending with a question invites the group to keep improving. Specific praise is as useful as specific criticism. Keep the summary short so most words go to feedback.

Related BUSI 431 sample papers

Other BUSI 431 weeks

More BS in Business Administration sample papers

BUSI 431 Week 8 questions, answered

What is the BUSI 431 Sales Plan Project Analysis?

An individual review of another group's completed sales plan, worth 55 points in Module/Week 8, of at least 350 words with relevant, insightful feedback, written in Word in APA format.

Where can I find a free BUSI 431 Week 8 sample paper?

The page below holds a complete BUSI 431 Week 8 analysis of another group's sales plan, with two strengths and two research-based improvements on territories and account retention.

How do you write useful feedback on a sales plan?

Summarize its goal, name specific strengths with the concepts behind them, choose the most important gaps, support each with evidence and suggest a concrete fix the authors can adopt.

Why does sales territory design matter?

Territories with unbalanced workloads leave some representatives overloaded and others underused; research finds that better alignment can increase sales without adding salespeople.

What else is due in BUSI 431 Module/Week 8?

The Forum 4 replies and Quiz 8, after chapter 17 of Castleberry and Tanner on managing a sales career; the final module/week closes on Friday.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.