BUSI 101 Week 2 Discussion Board Forum 1 Replies Example

Reviewed by Thomas Kerrigan, MBA, CPA · Liberty University · Updated

This BUSI 101 Week 2 sample answers two classmates in the opening forum, where the class debated what a business is for. The first answers a composite classmate who argued that a company's only duty is to its shareholders, agreeing that owners deserve a return while adding the case that long-run value depends on how a firm treats employees and customers. Reply two turns to Jasmine, who claimed that social responsibility always pays, adding a review that found the research more mixed and warning against promising returns that may not come. Liberty University BUSI 101 counts these 30-point BS in Business Administration replies in Module/Week 2, alongside Connect Assignment 2, Exam 1 and chapters 3 and 4 of Nickels et al.

CourseBUSI 101 Introduction to Business (BUSI101)
Module/Week2
AssignmentDiscussion Board Forum 1 Replies
Paper typeTwo discussion replies
Lengthabout 571 words (thread and replies). Course guide: replies to 2 classmates' Forum 1 threads, each 250 to 350 words with a Scripture reference, at least 1 scholarly source and the course text, in current APA format
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points30
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBS in Business Administration
Where it sitsModule/Week 2 in Liberty's published BUSI 101 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BUSI 101 Week 2

1

Discussion Board Forum 1 Replies: Responding to Classmates on Profit and Stakeholders

BUSI 101 Introduction to Business, Discussion Board Forum 1 Replies

Thread by [Student Name]

The classmates and their threads are composites; the studies, textbook and Scripture cited are real.

Reply to Brandon

Why this part earns its pointsThe first reply grants the classmate's strongest point before adding the long-run view.
2

Brandon, you argued that a company's only responsibility is to earn the highest return for its shareholders, since they own the business and take the risk. I agree that owners deserve a fair return; Nickels et al. (2018) describe profit as the reward for the risk a business takes, and without it no one would start a firm. I would add, though, that serving shareholders well over time requires attention to other groups.

Jensen (2002), who strongly defends value maximization, still argues that a firm cannot maximize its long-run value while ignoring employees, customers or communities, because each of them affects future earnings. A company that cuts training to raise this quarter's profit, for example, may lose skilled workers and customers next year. In that sense, caring for stakeholders is part of serving shareholders, not a departure from it. The textbook's own examples make the same point: firms that win loyal customers and keep good employees usually earn more over time than firms that treat both as costs to be minimized. Shareholders who plan to hold a company for years benefit from that loyalty as much as anyone.

Scripture also warns against short-term gain. Proverbs warns that money grabbed in a hurry shrinks, and that slow, steady gathering is what grows (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Proverbs 13:11). Profit squeezed out of people this year is often paid back with interest next year.

Do you think there is any situation where a manager should accept a lower return for shareholders, such as keeping employees on payroll during a short downturn? I ask because that choice tests whether a firm really believes its people are an investment or only says so in good times.

Reply to Jasmine

Why this part earns its pointsThe second reply supports the classmate's goal while correcting an overstatement about evidence.
3

Jasmine, your thread argued that corporate social responsibility always pays because customers reward companies that do good. I share your view that businesses should care for their communities, and Nickels et al. (2018) give several examples of firms whose social commitments strengthened their reputations. I would be more careful about the word always.

Margolis and Walsh (2003) reviewed more than a hundred studies of the link between social and financial performance. About half of the results they examined showed a positive relationship, while the rest were mixed, not significant or, in a few cases, negative, and the authors warned that the research does not tell managers when or why social initiatives pay off. A small business that spends heavily on a cause its customers do not notice may simply lose money. The authors also pointed out that many of the studies measured social performance and profit in very different ways, which makes it hard to compare their results or to draw a single conclusion from them. That caution applies to the meta-analysis many of us cited as well, since an average across studies can hide large differences between industries.

That does not mean responsibility is a mistake. Jesus taught His followers to do good and lend, expecting nothing in return (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Luke 6:35). For a Christian owner, doing right is justified whether or not it raises profit, which is a stronger foundation than a promise that it always will.

How would you decide which social commitments a small business should make if it cannot be sure they will pay off? For example, would you favor causes connected to the business's own customers and neighborhood, or causes chosen for their importance regardless of any return?

4

References

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235-256. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857812

Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556659

Nickels, W. G., McHugh, J. M., & McHugh, S. M. (2018). Understanding business (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

What the BUSI 101 Week 2 instructions ask

In Module/Week 2, BUSI 101 students read chapters 3 and 4 of Nickels et al., complete Connect Assignment 2, take Exam 1 and answer two of their classmates' opening threads. A reply should land between 250 and 350 words and carry a Scripture reference, at least one scholarly source and the course text, cited in current APA format. Together the replies are worth 30 points. A reply is expected to engage the classmate's argument, not just compliment it, which means agreeing or disagreeing with a reason and adding something from the reading or from research. With the first exam on the same calendar, drafting the replies before studying keeps both on track. Starting the replies early also leaves room to find a good peer-reviewed source rather than settling for the first result.

How this BUSI 101 Week 2 example is built

Both replies follow the same pattern but make opposite moves. The first meets a classmate who sees profit as the only goal, grants the strongest part of that view, and then adds research showing why owners' long-run interests depend on employees and customers, with a proverb about honest gain. The second meets a classmate who sees responsibility as a guaranteed payoff, agrees with its spirit and then adds a review showing that the evidence is mixed, with a verse on doing good without expecting a return. Each reply cites the course text, one scholarly article and Scripture, and each closes with a question.

BUSI 101 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go

Each reply earns its points by engaging a specific classmate's argument, staying within 250 to 350 words, and including all three required sources, a Scripture reference, one scholarly source and the course text, in current APA format. Bringing something the classmate lacked, a study or a sharper argument, scores better than echoing what the thread already said. Disagreement is welcome when it is respectful and supported. Well-written replies still drop points when the journal source or the verse is missing, and a student who answers only one classmate gives up roughly half the credit. Replies posted early in the module/week also give classmates time to respond.

BUSI 101 Week 2 help: mistakes that cost points

Choose two threads that take different positions from yours or from each other, since that gives you something to add. Start each reply by naming the classmate's main point accurately. Then give one reason you agree or disagree and support it with a peer-reviewed source and the textbook. Pick a verse that genuinely speaks to the point, and explain the connection in a sentence instead of quoting it alone. Check each reply's length once it is done; under 250 or over 350 costs points. End with a question, and check that every source appears in the reference list in APA format before you post. Reread both replies once for tone before posting.

Related BUSI 101 sample papers

Other BUSI 101 weeks

More BS in Business Administration sample papers

BUSI 101 Week 2 questions, answered

What are the BUSI 101 Forum 1 Replies?

Two replies to classmates' Forum 1 threads, worth 30 points together in Module/Week 2, each 250-350 words with Scripture, a scholarly source and the course text in APA format.

Where can I find a free BUSI 101 Week 2 sample paper?

The BUSI 101 Week 2 sample here gives two full forum replies on profit, shareholders and the limits of corporate social responsibility.

Is a company's only responsibility to its shareholders?

That view is often credited to Milton Friedman, but later scholars argue that long-run shareholder value itself depends on treating employees, customers and communities well.

Does corporate social responsibility always increase profits?

No. A review of over a hundred studies found a positive link in only about half of them, with the rest mixed, null or negative, which means social programs cannot be promised to pay off in every case.

What else is due in BUSI 101 Module/Week 2?

Students also complete Connect Assignment 2 and Exam 1, a one-hour open-book test of 40 questions, and read Nickels et al.'s chapters 3 and 4.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.