| Course | ACCT 650 Corporate Governance and Fraudulent Financial Reporting (ACCT650) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 3 |
| Assignment | Individual Learning Project Proposal |
| Paper type | Project proposal |
| Length | about 530 words, 2 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: a proposal of 1.5 to 3 pages, not counting the title page, references and exhibits, with at least 2 sources beyond the course textbook and the Bible, in current APA format |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| Points | 50 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | MS in Accounting |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 3 in Liberty's published ACCT 650 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for ACCT 650 Week 3
Proposal: Evaluating the Month-End Close and Journal Entry Controls at a Regional Medical Supply Distributor
[Student Name]
School of Business, Liberty University
ACCT 650: Corporate Governance and Fraudulent Financial Reporting
Individual Learning Project Proposal
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The distributor and its figures are a composite standing in for the student's own organization; the framework, studies and Bible passage cited are real.
Proposal: Evaluating the Month-End Close and Journal Entry Controls at a Regional Medical Supply Distributor
Organization and Process
Pinecrest Medical Distribution is a privately held distributor of surgical and patient-care supplies to hospitals and clinics in four states, with annual revenue of about $180 million. I work there as a senior accountant. The company's month-end close currently takes eleven business days, and roughly 60 percent of its journal entries by value are manual entries prepared and posted by a five-person accounting team. The company's bank lenders receive monthly financial statements and an annual audit, and the owners are considering a sale within three years, so the reliability of reported results matters to outside parties.
Problem Statement
A long close with heavy reliance on manual entries creates two risks: errors that are not caught before statements are issued, and entries that bypass review entirely. At Pinecrest, the same staff member can both prepare and post an entry, and review of entries below $25,000 is informal. A close that depends on a few people posting their own entries depends on those people never being wrong. The project will evaluate whether the controls over the close are designed and operating well enough to prevent or detect a material misstatement.
Scope
The project will cover the month-end close and the journal entry process only, from subledger cutoff to the issuance of monthly statements. It will exclude the revenue and procurement cycles except where their entries pass through the close. Within that scope, the project will pay particular attention to three kinds of entries that carry the most judgment: accruals for rebates owed to customers, inventory reserves and the monthly allocation of freight costs. Those entries are large, recur every month and rely on estimates, which makes them the most likely place for an error to go unnoticed.
Method
COSO's 2013 framework will supply the structure, with each finding filed under the one of its five components it concerns (Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission [COSO], 2013). Evidence will come from walkthroughs of the close with each team member, a review of written close procedures, and a sample of 40 manual entries from the last two quarters tested for preparation, approval and support. Findings will be classified by severity and paired with recommendations.
Deliverables and Timeline
The walkthroughs and the review of procedures will be completed in Module/Week 4, the sample of entries tested in Modules/Weeks 5 and 6, and the findings and recommendations written into the final paper for Module/Week 7. The paper will include a process map of the close as an exhibit and a table classifying each finding by COSO component and severity.
Why It Matters
Research shows that control weaknesses have measurable consequences for reported numbers. Ashbaugh-Skaife et al. (2008) tie reported control deficiencies to weaker accrual quality, which recovered once the deficiencies were fixed. Doyle et al. (2007) found that control weaknesses were more common at smaller companies and those with fewer resources for accounting, which describes Pinecrest's situation. Although both studies examined public companies, their findings suggest what a private distributor stands to gain from stronger close controls, especially before a sale. The project also reflects a biblical principle: stewards are expected to be found faithful (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, 1 Corinthians 4:2), and faithful stewardship of an owner's resources includes reporting them accurately.
References
Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., Kinney, W. R., Jr., & LaFond, R. (2008). The effect of SOX internal control deficiencies and their remediation on accrual quality. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 217-250. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.217
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2013). Internal control: Integrated framework.
Doyle, J., Ge, W., & McVay, S. (2007). Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1-2), 193-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.10.003
English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)
What the ACCT 650 Week 3 instructions ask
ACCT 650 students hand in the project proposal in the third module/week, a crowded week that also carries the Forum 3 thread, the Forum 2 reply and chapters 7 and 8 of Girgenti et al. The project as a whole requires the analysis and evaluation of an organization's financial reporting process and the related internal controls, and the proposal is where the student chooses the organization and frames the work. The syllabus sets it at one and a half to three pages, not counting the title page, references and exhibits, with two or more sources beyond the course textbook and the Bible, in current APA format. The final paper builds on whatever the proposal commits to, so scope decisions made here shape the next four weeks.
How this ACCT 650 Week 3 example is built
The proposal is organized as a short plan in five parts. It introduces the organization and the process to be studied, giving enough detail to show why the process matters: revenue size, close length and the share of manual entries. A problem statement explains what could go wrong and why. A scope section limits the project to the close and journal entries, which keeps it manageable. A method section explains how the evaluation will use the COSO framework's five components and what evidence will be collected, from walkthroughs to a sample of entries. A short closing paragraph connects the project to the biblical principle of faithful stewardship and lists the planned sources.
ACCT 650 Week 3 grading rubric: where the points go
The proposal is graded on whether it defines an organization and a financial reporting process clearly, frames a problem worth evaluating, sets a realistic scope and describes a credible method tied to a recognized internal control framework. Instructors also look for two or more outside sources besides Girgenti et al. and Scripture, used to justify the project rather than simply listed, and for current APA format within the one-and-a-half-to-three-page limit. A proposal that names a company but no specific process, or a process but no method, is hard to build on and usually loses points. Clear writing matters because the final paper will be judged against the plan stated here.
ACCT 650 Week 3 help: mistakes that cost points
Choose an organization you can actually observe, often your own employer, and one process within its financial reporting, such as the close, revenue or payables. State the problem in one sentence: what could cause a material misstatement? Narrow the scope so the final paper can go deep rather than wide. Name the framework you will use, usually COSO's five components, and the evidence you will gather, such as process walkthroughs, policies and a sample of transactions. Bring in two or more outside studies or standards, not counting Girgenti et al. or the Bible, that explain why the process matters. Keep the proposal within three pages, and protect confidential details by describing figures in round terms.
Related ACCT 650 sample papers
Other ACCT 650 weeks
- ACCT 650 Week 1: Forum 1 Thread
- ACCT 650 Week 2: Forum 2 Thread
- ACCT 650 Week 4: Forum 3 Reply
- ACCT 650 Week 5: Forum 4 Thread
- ACCT 650 Week 6: Forum 5 Thread
- ACCT 650 Week 7: Individual Learning Project
More MS in Accounting sample papers
- ACCT 616 Week 3: Case Study 2
- ACCT 618 Week 1: Reflection Essay
- ACCT 622 Week 3: Forum 2 Case Study
- ACCT 635 Week 3: Discussion Board Forum 3
ACCT 650 Week 3 questions, answered
What is the ACCT 650 Individual Learning Project Proposal?
A 50-point plan of 1.5 to 3 pages due in Module/Week 3, choosing an organization and framing an evaluation of its financial reporting process and internal controls, with two or more sources.
Where can I find a free ACCT 650 Week 3 sample paper?
This page shows a complete ACCT 650 Week 3 project proposal sample for evaluating a distributor's month-end close and journal entry controls against the COSO framework.
What framework should the ACCT 650 project use?
Most use COSO's 2013 internal control framework, judging the organization against its five parts, from the control environment at the base to the monitoring that checks everything else.
Can I use my own employer for the ACCT 650 project?
Yes, and many students do, describing figures in general terms to protect confidential information while evaluating a real financial reporting process and its controls.
What else is due in ACCT 650 Module/Week 3?
Two forum posts fall in the same week, the Forum 3 thread and the Forum 2 reply, while the reading covers chapters 7 and 8 of the Girgenti et al. text plus a presentation.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom ACCT 650 Week 3 sample · All ACCT 650 weeks · All courses