| Course | PSYC 645 Developmental Psychopathology (PSYC645) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 5 |
| Assignment | DB Forum 2 |
| Paper type | Discussion thread and replies |
| Length | about 768 words (thread and replies). Course guide: per the course guide, a thread of 350 to 400 words using course-related knowledge to address the assigned topic and replies of at least 200 words to 2 classmates, each thread and reply with at least 1 scholarly citation and 1 biblical reference in current APA format |
| Format | APA 7 citations and reference list |
| Points | 50 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | MS in Psychology |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 5 in Liberty's published PSYC 645 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PSYC 645 Week 5
Discussion Board Forum 2: Thread and Two Replies
PSYC 645 Developmental Psychopathology, Discussion Board Forum 2 (thread and two replies)
Thread by [Student Name]
The prompt, the child described and the classmates' posts are composites standing in for the course's own forum; Scripture, the textbook and the journal articles are real and described from their published sources; the requirements follow Liberty's public course guide for PSYC 645.
Thread
Eli turned six one week before his district's September 1 enrollment cutoff, so he started first grade as the youngest child in his class, nearly a full year younger than some classmates. By October, his teacher reported that he could not sit through reading groups, blurted out answers and lost his worksheets. She suggested an evaluation for ADHD. His parents noticed that at home, with a younger sister and no rows of desks, he seemed like any other six-year-old.
Parritz and Troy (2018) emphasize that developmental psychopathology judges behavior against what is typical for a child's age. Attention, impulse control and organization all develop rapidly in early childhood, so a behavior that is concerning in a seven-year-old may be ordinary in a child who just turned six.
Morrow et al. (2012) examined this problem in nearly a million children aged 6 to 12 in British Columbia, where the school cutoff is December 31, and found that boys born in December, the youngest in their grade, were about 30% more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD than boys born the previous January, while girls born in December were about 70% more likely. The youngest children were also more likely to receive stimulant medication. Because the month of a child's birth should not cause a neurodevelopmental disorder, the pattern suggests that some younger children's normal immaturity is being interpreted as pathology.
That does not mean Eli lacks ADHD. It means an evaluation should compare him with children his own age rather than his grade, gather information from more than one setting and consider waiting to see how his attention develops over the year. Classroom supports can be offered in the meantime without a diagnosis, so waiting does not mean doing nothing.
Psalm 139:14 praises God because each person is fearfully and wonderfully made (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016). Children develop on different timelines by design. A careful evaluation honors that truth by asking whether Eli is struggling or simply young, before attaching a label that may follow him for years.
How should school psychologists account for relative age when teachers refer the youngest children in a class?
Reply to Kendra
Kendra, you suggested that teachers simply need better training in child development, and I agree, though the problem reaches beyond teachers. Sroufe and Rutter (1984) defined developmental psychopathology as the study of the origins and course of individual patterns of behavioral maladaptation, insisting that disorder can only be understood against the background of normal development. That principle applies to everyone in the referral chain: teachers, parents, pediatricians and psychologists. A rating scale completed by a teacher naturally compares Eli with the class in front of her, which is exactly where the relative age effect enters, since the oldest children set the standard for everyone else. Psychologists can correct for this by using norms based on age rather than grade and by asking parents how Eli compares with neighborhood children of his own age. Proverbs 22:6 asks parents to shape a child along the path that suits him (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016). Training implies attention to the individual child's development and pace. A diagnosis made without that attention risks training Eli to see himself as a problem, when he may simply need another year to grow into the expectations of first grade. Asking about the child's birthday should become a routine part of every school referral.
Reply to Jonah
Jonah, you asked what Eli's parents should do if he does meet criteria for ADHD after a careful evaluation. Weisz et al. (2017) analyzed five decades of randomized trials of youth psychotherapy and found that treatments produced meaningful benefits on average, though effects varied by problem area and were smaller for some conditions and for longer-term outcomes. Their analysis also found that effects had not grown much over time, which suggests that matching treatment to the individual child and family matters as much as the brand of therapy chosen. For a young child like Eli, behavioral parent training and classroom adjustments, such as a desk close to the teacher and brief, well-structured assignments, are reasonable first steps before medication is considered, and they also help if his difficulties turn out to reflect immaturity rather than a lasting disorder. Galatians 6:2 asks Christians to carry each other's loads (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016). For Eli's family, that might mean a church community and school team working together, sharing the load so that his parents are not left to manage a difficult season alone. A family that feels supported is also more likely to follow through on parent training, which depends on consistent practice at home over many weeks.
References
English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)
Morrow, R. L., Garland, E. J., Wright, J. M., Maclure, M., Taylor, S., & Dormuth, C. R. (2012). Influence of relative age on diagnosis and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 184(7), 755-762. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.111619
Parritz, R. H., & Troy, M. F. (2018). Disorders of childhood: Development and psychopathology (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning.
Sroufe, L. A., & Rutter, M. (1984). The domain of developmental psychopathology. Child Development, 55(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129832
Weisz, J. R., Kuppens, S., Ng, M. Y., Eckshtain, D., Ugueto, A. M., Vaughn-Coaxum, R., Jensen-Doss, A., Hawley, K. M., Krumholz Marchette, L. S., Chu, B. C., Weersing, V. R., & Fordwood, S. R. (2017). What five decades of research tells us about the effects of youth psychological therapy: A multilevel meta-analysis and implications for science and practice. American Psychologist, 72(2), 79-117. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040360
What the PSYC 645 Week 5 instructions ask
Module/Week 5 brings the second and last PSYC 645 forum, a 50-point post that shares the week with the fifth quiz and follows the eighth chapter of Parritz and Troy, Wilmshurst's cases 21 and 23 and a presentation. Its pattern matches Forum 1: a thread of 350 to 400 words on the assigned topic, written from course knowledge, then answers to two peers that run past 200 words. Each of those three posts needs its own research citation and its own biblical reference, in APA style. With only two forums in the course, this one is the last chance to show integration in discussion form before the Personal Perspective Paper.
How this PSYC 645 Week 5 example is built
The thread opens with Eli, who turned six a week before his school's September cutoff and is now the youngest in his first-grade class, struggling to sit through reading groups. The developmental perspective of Parritz and Troy, which judges behavior against age norms, frames the question. Morrow and colleagues' study of relative age supplies the evidence, with its sample, comparison and results for boys and girls. Psalm 139:14 adds the biblical view of the child. The thread recommends comparing Eli with same-age rather than same-grade peers before diagnosing. One reply draws on Sroufe and Rutter's definition of the field, and the other on Weisz and colleagues' meta-analysis of youth therapy.
PSYC 645 Week 5 grading rubric: where the points go
Grading in Forum 2 looks at whether the thread stays between 350 and 400 words while handling the assigned topic accurately, whether each response to a peer clears 200 words and engages the argument and whether every post pairs research with Scripture in APA form. Strong threads apply the developmental principle that behavior must be judged against age norms, using research described with its sample and findings. They also avoid overstatement; a relative age effect suggests overdiagnosis among the youngest children without proving that ADHD is not real. Scripture should address the value of children or the care owed them, connected to the clinical question.
PSYC 645 Week 5 help: mistakes that cost points
When discussing diagnosis, avoid taking a side in the culture war over whether ADHD exists. The stronger argument is developmental: some young children who meet criteria on paper may simply be younger than their classmates, and careful assessment should account for that. Describe the study's design precisely, since a population-based sample is what makes it persuasive. Keep the thread under 400 words by choosing one study and one child, and save other research for your replies. In replies, bring different research, perhaps on assessment or treatment, and a different passage. Remember that each reply needs both a scholarly citation and a biblical reference of its own, separate from the thread's, and that the thread's verse cannot be reused.
Related PSYC 645 sample papers
Other PSYC 645 weeks
- PSYC 645 Week 1: Forum 1: Two Brothers, Two Pathways
- PSYC 645 Week 2: Treatment Evaluation: Child Anxiety
- PSYC 645 Week 8: Personal Perspective Paper: CBT View
More MS in Psychology sample papers
- PSYC 635 Week 5: Forum 5: Personality Keeps Maturing
- PSYC 636 Week 5: Forum 3: Suicide Risk in Later Life
PSYC 645 Week 5 questions, answered
What is PSYC 645 DB Forum 2?
The last of the course's two discussions, worth 50 points in Module/Week 5; like Forum 1, it calls for a thread between 350 and 400 words plus two longer responses, each with research and a Bible reference.
Where can I find a free PSYC 645 Week 5 sample paper?
Read the complete PSYC 645 Week 5 forum on relative age, ADHD diagnosis and telling immaturity from disorder, including both replies, on this page.
Are the youngest children in a class more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD?
Yes; Morrow and colleagues found that among nearly a million children, those born just before the enrollment cutoff were more likely to be diagnosed and medicated than their oldest classmates.
Why does age matter in diagnosing childhood disorders?
Developmental psychopathology judges behavior against what is typical for a child's age, so normal immaturity in younger children can be mistaken for symptoms if they are compared with older classmates.
What else is due in PSYC 645 Module/Week 5?
Quiz 5, twenty-five open-book items on chapter 8 and the module's two Wilmshurst cases, finished within half an hour like the other seven quizzes.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom PSYC 645 Week 5 sample · All PSYC 645 weeks · All courses