NURS 617 Week 2 Reflection Paper 1 on the Clinical Educator I Want to Become Example

Reviewed by Rachel Stanton, MSN, RN · Liberty University · Updated

This NURS 617 Week 2 example is a full opening reflection, written by a composite nurse at the start of the educator track who remembers two clinical instructors, one who made students feel they belonged and one who made them afraid, and reflects on what kind of clinical educator to become. Liberty University NURS 617, the opening course of the MSN nurse educator track, assigns Reflection Paper 1 in Module/Week 2 for 100 points, the same week the final practicum goals are due; the paper answers a topic posed by the instructor, includes personal reflection on the role of nurse educator, and runs five pages or more with four to six peer-reviewed references from the last five years and APA level headings. The sample reflects with a scoping review on instructors and resilience, a study of instructor leadership and belonging, and research on self-assessment and failing to fail.

CourseNURS 617 Nurse Educator I: Advanced Clinical Applications (NURS617)
Module/Week2
AssignmentReflection Paper 1 on the Clinical Educator I Want to Become
Paper typeReflection paper (5+ pages, 4 to 6 recent peer-reviewed references)
Lengthabout 1,355 words, 5 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: at least five pages of reflection in APA with level headings, title and reference pages excluded from the count, drawing on four to six refereed studies published since 2021
FormatAPA 7 student paper
Points100
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramMSN
Where it sitsModule/Week 2 in Liberty's published NURS 617 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NURS 617 Week 2

1

Reflection Paper 1: The Clinical Instructor Who Made Me Belong, and What It Means for the Educator I Want to Become

 

[Student Name]

School of Nursing, Liberty University

NURS 617: Nurse Educator I: Advanced Clinical Applications

Reflection Paper 1

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

 

Written in the first person as a reflection; the instructors and students described are composites. Answer the topic your instructor poses.

Why this part earns its pointsThe title contrasts two instructors and points to the writer's future role, so the grader can see the reflection will connect past experience to the educator role.
2

Reflection Paper 1: The Clinical Instructor Who Made Me Belong, and What It Means for the Educator I Want to Become

Introduction

I remember my clinical instructors more clearly than almost any classroom teacher. One of them made me feel that I belonged on a hospital unit before I believed it myself. Another made me so afraid of making a mistake that I hid one. As I begin the nurse educator track and plan my first practicum hours, I find myself returning to those two people, because they showed me, in opposite ways, how much a clinical educator shapes a student. This reflection examines both experiences, interprets them through recent research on clinical teaching, considers the more difficult evaluative side of the role, and sets out commitments for the kind of educator I want to become.

Two Instructors

The Instructor Who Made Me Belong

In my first medical-surgical rotation, our instructor met each of us at the unit doors on the first morning, introduced us by name to the charge nurse, and told the staff, "These are my students, and they are here to help you and learn from you." She asked each of us what worried us most and checked on that worry during the day. When I froze while giving report, she stood beside me and asked one question that unlocked my thinking: "What is the one thing the next nurse needs to know about this patient?" By the end of the rotation, the nurses on the unit called me by name and asked me to help with their patients. I felt like a nurse in training rather than a visitor.

The Instructor Who Made Me Afraid

Two semesters later, a different instructor corrected students loudly in hallways and at bedsides, sometimes in front of patients. Students learned to avoid asking questions. One afternoon, I realized I had documented a blood pressure on the wrong patient's record. I fixed it quietly without telling anyone, because I was more afraid of the instructor than of the error. Nothing bad happened, but I learned the wrong lesson: that mistakes should be hidden rather than reported. It took me years as a staff nurse to unlearn it.

Why this part earns its pointsThe two short scenes give the reflection concrete material, and the hidden error shows honest self-examination rather than a flattering story.
3

What Research Says About These Experiences

Belonging and Leadership

My first instructor gave me a sense of belonging, and research suggests that this is not a small thing. In a cross-sectional study of 253 undergraduate nursing students at two nursing schools, Namdari et al. (2026) measured students' perceptions of their clinical instructors' leadership styles and the students' sense of belonging in clinical placements. Belongingness was moderate overall, transactional leadership was the style students saw most often and transformational leadership the least, and the two styles together explained 18% of the variation in students' belonging. The authors recommended preparing clinical instructors in leadership approaches associated with greater belonging. My first instructor's introductions, her interest in our worries and her presence when we struggled sound very much like the individual consideration that transformational leaders show.

Resilience and Support

My second instructor made clinical learning more stressful than it needed to be. A recent scoping review helps explain why that matters. Gilmer et al. (2026) screened 3,039 citations and found four studies on how clinical instructors affect students' resilience. Their themes were that instructors can equip students with coping strategies, that instructors' teaching characteristics matter, that instructors can support students' growing capacity, and that instructors influence the clinical learning environment. The small number of studies limits what can be concluded, but the direction is clear: instructors can make students more resilient or less. Looking back, my second instructor's public corrections taught me to cope by hiding, which is the opposite of resilience in a profession that depends on reporting errors.

The Harder Side of the Role

A tempting conclusion would be that the best clinical educator is simply the kindest one. My own nursing experience tells me that is not true. As a preceptor, I have seen how hard it is to tell a likable new nurse that their practice is not yet safe. Adkins and Aucoin (2022) studied this difficulty in clinical faculty, surveying 327 instructors about the social pressures involved in giving a failing grade. The instructors who admitted passing weak students reported feeling the sting of bad-news conversations more sharply than colleagues who had never done so, and the authors described a direct link between those pressures and passing students who did not meet the criteria. My first instructor was kind, but I now realize she was also honest; she told me plainly when my report was disorganized, and her kindness was what made the honesty bearable.

Self-assessment may help hold kindness and honesty together. Wilgenbusch et al. (2026) adapted a clinical judgment rubric so that students could rate themselves at two points in an academic year and found that students' self-assessed judgment grew significantly, with weaker students also rating themselves lower. If students and instructors use the same criteria, a difficult conversation becomes a shared look at the evidence rather than a verdict delivered from above.

What My First Practicum Planning Has Shown Me

Planning my practicum with my preceptor this week has already tested these ideas. My preceptor teaches a group of eight second-semester students on a medical unit, and when we discussed how I would begin, my first instinct was to describe the skills I could demonstrate. My preceptor asked instead how I would learn what each student was afraid of. The question stopped me, because it was exactly what my first instructor had done on that first morning, and I had not thought to plan it. We agreed that on my first practicum day I will meet each student briefly before the shift, ask what worries them, and note one thing I can do to help.

The conversation also showed me how easily the evaluative side of the role can be postponed. When I asked how students are evaluated on the unit, my preceptor explained that concerns are documented weekly on a shared form and discussed with the student the same week. I realized that this routine, not any personality trait, is what allows my preceptor to be both supportive and honest. A weekly record makes a difficult conversation a matter of evidence rather than impression, and it protects students from the kind of surprise that a final evaluation can bring. I plan to adopt the same routine and to ask my preceptor to review my first two entries with me.

Why this part earns its pointsConnecting the reflection to the writer's actual practicum planning shows the role being learned in real time, which the assignment asks for.
4

Commitments for My Practicum

These reflections lead to four commitments for my practicum hours this term. First, I will introduce every learner I work with to the staff by name and explain their purpose on the unit, as my first instructor did, so that belonging begins on the first day. Second, I will correct errors privately and frame them as learning, while making clear that errors must be reported, so that learners learn honesty rather than concealment. Third, I will use one clinical judgment rubric with my learners from the first week and ask them to rate themselves before I give my own rating. Fourth, I will document any concern about safe practice the same day, so that honest evaluation does not depend on how I feel about a learner. My preceptor will review my notes on each commitment at the midpoint of the practicum.

A Sense of Calling

My first instructor once told me that she taught because someone had once believed in her. I want to offer that same belief to learners while holding them to the standards their patients deserve. Paul pictured a church growing up together as its members spoke "the truth in love" (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Ephesians 4:15), and I can think of no better summary of clinical teaching. Truth without love produced my hidden error. Love without truth would produce nurses who are not ready. The educator I want to become holds both.

Conclusion

Two clinical instructors taught me what belonging and fear feel like to a student. Research on leadership, resilience, evaluation and self-assessment helps me understand why they had such different effects and shows that the qualities I admired in my first instructor can be learned and practiced. In my practicum, I will begin practicing them deliberately, beginning with the first morning I meet my preceptor's students and ask what worries them. I expect to make mistakes in the role, and I intend to treat my own errors the way I hope my learners will treat theirs: as something to report, examine and learn from.

5

References

Adkins, D. A., & Aucoin, J. W. (2022). Failure to fail: Factors affecting faculty decisions to pass underperforming nursing students in the clinical setting: A quantitative study. Nurse Education in Practice, 58, Article 103259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103259

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

Gilmer, C., Woods, P., & Murdoch, N. H. (2026). How clinical instructors affect resilience in undergraduate nursing students during clinical education: A scoping review. The Journal of Nursing Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20260708-02

Namdari, S., Mousavi, S. K., Kamali, M., & Mollaei, F. (2026). Clinical instructors' leadership styles and their relationship with clinical belongingness among nursing students: A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09845-w

Wilgenbusch, B. A., Jurevic, V. D., Gilb, K. E., Jeanmougin, C. E., Zehler, A. R., Cole, B. S., & Osborne, J. (2026). Adapting the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric for student self-assessment. The Journal of Nursing Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20260227-05

What the NURS 617 Week 2 instructions ask

The two reflection papers in NURS 617 are written on topics the instructor poses, and the guide asks each to include personal reflection on the student's role as a nurse educator. Each must reach at least five pages, use APA level headings, and draw on four to six refereed studies from the last five years; the cover page and reference list are required but sit outside the page count. The first lands in Module/Week 2, in the same week the final practicum goals go in, and students begin thinking about the learners they will teach. Topics at this point often ask students to reflect on their own experiences as learners in clinical settings and what those experiences mean for the educators they intend to become.

How this NURS 617 Week 2 example is built

The reflection is built around two remembered instructors who represent different approaches to clinical teaching. Each is described in a short scene, then interpreted through recent research: a scoping review of how clinical instructors affect students' resilience and a study linking instructors' leadership styles to students' sense of belonging. The paper then turns to the harder side of the role, honest evaluation, using research on failing to fail and on student self-assessment. Level headings follow APA format. The reflection ends with four commitments for the practicum and a short statement of the writer's sense of calling.

NURS 617 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go

Reflection papers in NURS 617 are typically graded on the depth of personal reflection, connection to the nurse educator role, integration of four to six recent peer-reviewed references, organization with level headings, and APA style over five pages or more. Graders look for reflection that analyzes experiences rather than retelling them, and for research that explains or challenges the writer's views. Because the guide specifies recent peer-reviewed sources, textbooks and older articles do not count toward the four to six. Papers earn more when they end with commitments the student can act on in the practicum, which links the reflection to the course's clinical teaching goals.

NURS 617 Week 2 help: mistakes that cost points

The most common problems with this reflection are papers that tell long stories without interpreting them, papers that summarize research without personal reflection, and papers that fall short of five pages once the title and references are removed. Some students forget the level headings the guide requires. Others cite fewer than four peer-reviewed sources or include ones older than five years. Choose one or two vivid experiences, describe them in enough detail to analyze, interpret them with recent studies, address both the supportive and the evaluative sides of the educator role, use clear APA headings, and close with specific commitments you will test in your practicum hours and revisit in the second reflection.

Related NURS 617 sample papers

Other NURS 617 weeks

More MSN sample papers

NURS 617 Week 2 questions, answered

What is NURS 617 Reflection Paper 1?

A 100-point Module/Week 2 reflection on a topic set by the instructor, connecting personal experience to the nurse educator role, at least five pages in APA with level headings and four to six recent peer-reviewed sources.

Where can I find a free NURS 617 Week 2 sample paper?

The full NURS 617 Week 2 reflection on clinical instructors, belonging and honest evaluation, with references and grading notes, is posted here for anyone to study.

How do clinical instructors affect nursing students?

They shape students' sense of belonging, their stress and resilience, and their learning, through how they teach, support, question and evaluate students in the clinical setting.

What is clinical belongingness?

A nursing student's sense of being accepted, valued and included by staff and instructors during clinical placement, which supports learning and confidence.

Do NURS 617 reflection papers need headings?

Yes. The guide asks for appropriate APA level headings, at least five pages of text, and four to six peer-reviewed references published within the last five years.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.