| Course | NURS 502 Nursing Theory and Advanced Practice (NURS502) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 7 |
| Assignment | Theory-Based Exemplar Paper Final Paper |
| Paper type | Theory-based exemplar paper (final) |
| Length | about 2,066 words, 8 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: 8 to 10 pages with at least 4 scholarly sources |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| Points | 150 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | MSN |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 7 in Liberty's published NURS 502 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NURS 502 Week 7
Understanding Before Teaching: Modeling and Role-Modeling in the Care of a Long-Haul Driver Newly Diagnosed With Heart Failure
[Student Name]
School of Nursing, Liberty University
NURS 502: Nursing Theory and Advanced Practice
Theory-Based Exemplar Paper: Final Paper
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The patient, the clinic and the visits described are composites written for a model paper; no real patient is described.
Understanding Before Teaching: Modeling and Role-Modeling in the Care of a Long-Haul Driver Newly Diagnosed With Heart Failure
The Practice Situation
A long-haul truck driver in their late fifties was referred to our nurse practitioner-led heart failure clinic after a first admission for shortness of breath and leg swelling. An echocardiogram showed heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. At discharge the patient received prescriptions for guideline-directed medications, a scale, a booklet and an appointment within a week. The patient missed that appointment and the next one. When the clinic finally reached the patient by phone, the patient was on the road two states away, had stopped two of the medications and said the clinic "wanted to take away the only thing I know how to do."
Our usual response to missed visits was more education: a call from a nurse to review medications and the importance of follow-up. That approach had already failed. The turning point came when the advanced practice nurse stopped explaining heart failure to the patient and started asking what heart failure meant to the patient. This paper describes how Modeling and Role-Modeling theory guided that change and the care that followed.
The Theory in Brief
Modeling and Role-Modeling holds that nurses should first understand a client's world from the client's perspective, the step its authors call modeling, and then plan care that starts from that understanding, the step they call role-modeling (Erickson et al., 1983). Its starting assumptions are that clients understand more about their illness than clinicians tend to credit, that every person leans toward growth when needs are met, and that losses, unmet needs and stalled development drain the energy a person has for coping. It gives nurses the adaptive potential assessment model to judge how much a client can take on, and five aims of intervention to structure care: build trust, promote a positive orientation, promote perceived control, promote strengths and set mutual health-directed goals.
Modeling: Learning the Patient's World
The advanced practice nurse arranged a video visit at a truck stop on a Sunday afternoon, the only time the patient was free, and opened by asking what the patient thought had happened. The answer reshaped the case. The patient believed the heart was "worn out" from years of hard work and that any limit the clinic set, on salt, on fluids or on driving hours, was the start of being declared unfit to drive. The patient's father had stopped driving a delivery route after a heart attack and, in the patient's telling, "never got out of the chair again." Losing the commercial license would mean losing income, but the patient also described driving as the work that made them useful to the grown children they still helped support.
Seen through the theory, this was self-care knowledge that the clinic had never asked about, and it explained the missed visits better than any label of noncompliance. The patient was not ignoring the illness; the patient was protecting a role. The theory's attention to development helped as well. At 58, the patient was working through what Erickson et al. (1983), drawing on Erik Erikson, would describe as generativity, the drive to contribute to the next generation, and the illness threatened exactly that contribution. The concept of affiliated individuation explained the pull between the patient's independence on the road and the need for connection to family and care.
Adaptive Potential: Setting the Pace
Using the adaptive potential assessment model, the nurse judged the patient to be close to impoverishment rather than in arousal. The patient was sleeping poorly in the truck, eating at truck stops, worried about money and had no one nearby. A person with depleted resources cannot take on a full regimen of daily weights, fluid limits, four new medications and weekly visits at once. The nurse therefore planned a slower start than the guideline sequence would suggest, choosing the changes with the most benefit and the least burden first, while recognizing that guideline-directed medical therapy reduces hospitalization and death and should be built up as quickly as the patient could tolerate (Heidenreich et al., 2022).
Role-Modeling: The Five Aims in Practice
Building Trust
Trust began with the nurse showing that the clinic was not trying to end the patient's career. The nurse explained that a heart failure diagnosis does not automatically end commercial driving, that driving decisions are made through the medical certification process and depend on symptoms and treatment, and that the clinic's goal was to keep the patient well enough to keep working. The nurse also offered visits by video on Sundays and phone check-ins at fuel stops, adapting the clinic to the patient's life rather than the reverse.
Promoting a Positive Orientation
The patient's model linked the illness to inevitable decline, as with the father. The nurse acknowledged that fear and then offered a different picture grounded in evidence: many people with reduced ejection fraction improve on treatment, and some recover substantial heart function. The patient was asked to name what a good year would look like, and answered with a grandchild's graduation and two more years of driving before retirement.
Promoting Perceived Control
Control was the patient's central concern, so the plan gave the patient decisions to make. The patient chose to keep the scale in the truck cab and weigh in each morning at the first stop, and chose which two salty foods to cut first. Riegel and colleagues frame chronic illness care as three linked activities, keeping the body stable, watching for change and acting on what is noticed (Riegel et al., 2012), monitoring and management as the processes through which patients take charge of their own care (Riegel et al., 2012), and the nurse used that language to frame the patient as the person running the plan, with the clinic as support.
Promoting Strengths
The patient had real strengths: discipline, mechanical skill, a habit of keeping a logbook for every trip and a strong sense of responsibility to family. The nurse built on them, adding weight, symptoms and medication times to the driving log the patient already kept. A daily habit the patient valued became the vehicle for monitoring.
Setting Mutual Health-Directed Goals
Together the patient and nurse set three goals for the first month: take the two restarted medications every day, log a morning weight and call the clinic if it rose by more than two pounds overnight or five in a week, and keep one video visit every two weeks. These goals were smaller than a standard discharge plan, but they were the patient's goals.
Outcomes Over Three Months
Over the following three months the patient kept every video visit, logged weights on all but a handful of days and called once when weight rose four pounds over two days, which allowed a diuretic adjustment by phone instead of an emergency visit. Medication doses were increased in steps at each visit, and the patient agreed to a third medication in the second month once trust was established. There were no readmissions and no emergency visits. The patient's blood pressure and heart rate at rest improved, the leg swelling resolved, and the patient reported walking around the truck at every fuel stop, a habit the patient had started without being asked. At the three-month visit the patient described feeling "in charge of this thing instead of it being in charge of me," a statement that maps closely onto the theory's aim of perceived control.
Published research on the theory has measured something close to what this patient described. Stroke survivors whose care followed the theory reported stronger confidence in managing their recovery than those given routine care (Jeddi et al., 2023), and patients with cancers of the upper digestive tract reported better quality of life after theory-based self-care support than after receiving pamphlets (Ordouni et al., 2023). Both trials were small, came from one research group and relied on self-report, so they support the theory's usefulness without proving it. One patient's improvement cannot test a theory, but the pattern in this case is consistent with those findings.
The Family and Spiritual Dimensions
The theory's holism directed attention beyond the patient's body and schedule. The patient was divorced, lived alone between trips and had two adult children in another state who did not know about the admission. Affiliated individuation suggested that the patient's independence on the road was real but also lonely, and that connection could be a resource rather than a threat to independence. In the second month the nurse asked whether the patient wanted a family member involved, and the patient chose to tell one daughter, who began calling on the evenings the patient weighed in. The patient later said those calls mattered more than any reminder from the clinic.
Spiritual concerns surfaced as well. The patient had attended a church as a young adult and, after the admission, began listening to sermons on long drives. The nurse asked about this without steering it and learned that the patient found comfort in the idea of not carrying everything alone. The theory treats spirit as part of the whole person and gives nurses permission to ask, and a Christian advanced practice nurse can honor that dimension by listening, offering a chaplain or a local congregation if the patient wants one, and respecting the patient's own pace.
Revisions Made After Peer Review
The first draft of this paper drew three main comments from the peer reviewer. The reviewer noted that the draft described the five aims as a list rather than showing each one at work, so this final gives each aim its own subsection with a specific action. The reviewer also asked for a clearer account of why care was paced slowly, which led to the separate section on adaptive potential. Finally, the reviewer suggested that the evaluation was too favorable, and the final now names three limits of the theory in this situation. The instructor's comment that the clinical decisions needed a guideline source was addressed by citing the heart failure guideline for medication titration.
Evaluation of the Theory in This Situation
The theory explained what the clinic's education-first approach could not: why a capable patient kept missing visits. Its emphasis on the client's model led directly to the turning point, and the adaptive potential model gave a reasoned basis for pacing care. The five aims provided a structure that was easy to follow in practice.
The theory also had limits. It offers little direct guidance on clinical decisions such as medication titration, which came from the heart failure guideline rather than from the theory. Modeling took time, about forty minutes in the first video visit, which a busy clinic cannot always give, and the theory does not say how to balance that time against other patients' needs. Finally, the theory assumes the client can share a model of the world; a patient with cognitive impairment or a severe language barrier would require adaptations the theory does not describe. A middle-range theory of self-care was needed alongside it to frame the specific self-care behaviors (Riegel et al., 2012), which suggests the theory works best as a lens paired with more specific tools.
Implications for Advanced Practice
For advanced practice nurses, this situation shows that a patient labeled noncompliant may be acting reasonably from a model no one has asked about. After this case, our clinic changed its first visit for every new patient to include three questions drawn from the theory: what the patient believes caused the heart failure, what the patient fears it will take away and what would make the plan worth following. The clinic also began offering flexible video visits for patients whose work keeps them away from home. These are small changes in routine, but they put the theory's first step, understanding before teaching, into every new patient's care. The clinic also began tracking missed visits by reason rather than by count, because the reasons, such as work schedules, distance, fear or cost, point to different responses. An advanced practice nurse leading the clinic can use those data to argue for resources, such as evening video hours, that the theory suggests patients need. Over time, the questions themselves became a way of teaching new staff to see patients as the theory sees them, as people with their own understanding of the illness that care must begin from.
Conclusion
Modeling and Role-Modeling guided an advanced practice nurse from repeated, failed education to an understanding of what heart failure meant to a long-haul driver, and from there to a plan built on the patient's own goals and strengths. The theory's concepts of self-care knowledge, adaptive potential and the five aims of intervention explained the patient's behavior and shaped each step of care. Its limits, especially for clinical decisions and time-pressured settings, show that it is most useful as a lens joined with clinical guidelines and more specific self-care theory.
References
Erickson, H. C., Tomlin, E. M., & Swain, M. A. P. (1983). Modeling and role-modeling: A theory and paradigm for nursing. Prentice-Hall.
Heidenreich, P. A., Bozkurt, B., Aguilar, D., Allen, L. A., Byun, J. J., Colvin, M. M., Deswal, A., Drazner, M. H., Dunlay, S. M., Evers, L. R., Fang, J. C., Fedson, S. E., Fonarow, G. C., Hayek, S. S., Hernandez, A. F., Khazanie, P., Kittleson, M. M., Lee, C. S., Link, M. S., . . . Yancy, C. W. (2022). 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 145(18), e895-e1032. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063
Jeddi, H., Aghebati, N., Ghavami, V., & Rezaeitalab, F. (2023). The effect of self-care nurturance using the theory of modeling and role-modeling on self-efficacy in stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Holistic Nursing Practice, 37(2), E24-E35. https://doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0000000000000567
Ordouni, K., Aghebati, N., Ghavami, V., & Movahed, S. (2023). The effect of self-care nurturance based on Erickson's modeling and role-modeling theory on quality of life of patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer: A randomized clinical trial. Holistic Nursing Practice, 37(3), E36-E50. https://doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0000000000000578
Riegel, B., Jaarsma, T., & Strömberg, A. (2012). A middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness. Advances in Nursing Science, 35(3), 194-204. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0b013e318261b1ba
What the NURS 502 Week 7 instructions ask
Week 7 brings the exemplar sequence in NURS 502 to its end. Liberty's course guide describes the TEP as an opportunity to apply a selected nursing theory to an actual practice situation, and it sets the final paper at eight to ten pages in current APA format with at least four scholarly sources, worth 150 points in Module/Week 7. Instructors expect the final to reflect the revisions suggested in the peer review and the instructor's feedback on the draft. A strong final usually includes a brief summary of the theory, a detailed description of the practice situation, an explicit application of each major concept to that situation, an evaluation of how well the theory explained and guided care, and implications for advanced practice.
How this NURS 502 Week 7 example is built
The paper opens with the practice situation told as a story, then returns to it section by section. A short theory overview reminds the reader of the concepts in plain terms rather than repeating the Week 3 analysis. The modeling section shows what the nurse learned by asking the patient's view of the illness, and the adaptive potential section explains why the first visits asked for very little. Each of the five aims gets its own subsection with what was done and why. The evaluation section is candid about what the theory did not explain, and a section on advanced practice closes with how the clinic changed its first-visit routine. Four scholarly sources and a guideline support the clinical content.
NURS 502 Week 7 grading rubric: where the points go
The final exemplar paper is usually graded on accurate representation of the theory, a practice situation that is a genuine exemplar, thorough application of each major concept, critical evaluation of the theory's usefulness, implications for advanced practice, incorporation of peer and instructor feedback, and APA writing within eight to ten pages with at least four scholarly sources. Application carries the most weight; the rubric rewards showing how each concept changed what the nurse noticed or did. Evaluation earns points when it names limits as well as strengths. Graders also compare the final with the draft, so visible revisions in response to feedback matter as much as polish.
NURS 502 Week 7 help: mistakes that cost points
The most common shortfall in the final exemplar is a paper that describes the theory well and the patient well but never connects them, so that the theory reads like a frame placed around an unrelated story. Name each concept where it applies and say what it led the nurse to do. Another problem is ignoring peer review comments; the grader often has the draft. Students also choose a situation in which everything went well, which makes evaluation thin; a situation with a turning point shows the theory working. Keep clinical detail to what the theory needs, cite at least four scholarly sources, and end with what you would do differently in advanced practice.
Related NURS 502 sample papers
Other NURS 502 weeks
- NURS 502 Week 1: Written Responses to Questions 1
- NURS 502 Week 2: Personal Philosophy Paper
- NURS 502 Week 3: TEP Theory Analysis
- NURS 502 Week 4: Written Responses to Questions 2
- NURS 502 Week 5: Discussion Board Forum 1
- NURS 502 Week 6: TEP Peer Review
- NURS 502 Week 8: Discussion Board Forum 3
More MSN sample papers
NURS 502 Week 7 questions, answered
What is the NURS 502 TEP Final Paper?
It is the last and largest piece of the exemplar sequence, due in Module/Week 7 for 150 points, applying a nursing theory to an actual practice situation in eight to ten pages with at least four scholarly sources, revised from the draft and peer review.
Where can I find a free NURS 502 Week 7 sample paper?
The NURS 502 Week 7 final exemplar on a truck driver with heart failure appears on this page in full, with its five-aims application, references and notes on each section. It is free and needs no account.
How is the TEP final different from the first draft?
The final should show revisions based on the peer review and instructor feedback, a fuller application of every concept, a critical evaluation of the theory and implications for advanced practice, within eight to ten pages.
What makes a good exemplar for a nursing theory paper?
A good exemplar is a real situation in which the theory's concepts are clearly visible and in which applying the theory changed what the nurse noticed or did, ideally with a turning point the theory helps explain.
How many sources does the NURS 502 final exemplar paper need?
Liberty's guide requires at least four scholarly sources. Strong papers cite the theorists' original work, research that has used the theory and current clinical evidence relevant to the situation.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom NURS 502 Week 7 sample · All NURS 502 weeks · All courses