BUSI 687 Week 3 DB Forum 2 Example

Reviewed by Thomas Kerrigan, MBA, CPA · Liberty University · Updated

Written for BUSI 687 Week 3, this sample gives Discussion Board Forum 2 whole: a thread near 410 words and two replies of about 270 words apiece, for the module on health insurance, chapter 4 of the Dalton text. Here the composite topic asks whether a family should move from a traditional employer health plan to a high-deductible plan paired with a health savings account. Using KFF's 2025 figures, an average family premium of $26,993 and an average single deductible of $1,886, the thread sets the two options side by side for a family of four and recommends the high-deductible plan only if the savings are deposited in the account, citing research in which workers switched to such a plan used less care, some of it care they needed, and did little comparison shopping. Liberty University BUSI 687 assigns this MBA health insurance forum 25 points.

CourseBUSI 687 Insurance & Risk Management (BUSI687)
Module/Week3
AssignmentDB Forum 2
Paper typeDiscussion thread and two replies
Lengthabout 964 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a thread of at least 350 words that includes at least 2 sources and integrates experience with course-related information, posted in the forum and attached as a Word document, and two replies of at least 250 words each
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points25
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramMBA
Where it sitsModule/Week 3 in Liberty's published BUSI 687 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BUSI 687 Week 3

1

Discussion Board Forum 2: Thread and Replies

BUSI 687 Insurance & Risk Management, Discussion Board Forum 2 (thread and two replies)

Thread by [Student Name]

The forum topic, the family's plan options and the classmates are composites standing in for the course's own; the premium and deductible averages come from KFF's 2025 employer survey, and the textbook and research cited are real; the requirements follow Liberty's public course guide for BUSI 687.

Thread

Why this part earns its pointsThe thread grounds the choice in current national figures before turning to the family's own numbers.
2

The topic asks us to advise a composite family of four whose employer offers two plans. KFF's 2025 survey of employers gives the context: the average annual premium for family coverage reached $26,993 and the average deductible for single coverage was $1,886 (KFF, 2025). Rising costs explain why employers increasingly offer high-deductible plans, which Dalton et al. (2018) describe as shifting more of the cost of routine care to the insured in exchange for lower premiums, often paired with a tax-advantaged health savings account.

The family's choices look like this:

FeatureTraditional planHigh-deductible plan
Employee share of annual premium$7,800$4,600
Family deductible$1,000$3,400
Out-of-pocket maximum$6,000$8,000
Employer deposit to health savings accountNone$1,000

In a light year, with $1,500 of care, the traditional plan costs about $8,900 ($7,800 premium, the full $1,000 deductible and roughly $100 of coinsurance on the rest), while the high-deductible plan costs about $5,100 ($4,600 plus $1,500 of care, less the $1,000 employer deposit). In a heavy year that hits both out-of-pocket maximums, the traditional plan costs $13,800 and the high-deductible plan $11,600. On paper, the high-deductible plan wins in both years, largely because of the lower premium and the employer's deposit. The gap is widest in a light year, which is the kind of year a family with young, healthy children usually has, and narrowest in a heavy one. The main risk in the high-deductible plan is not the total for the year but its timing, since a large bill in February arrives before the account has had time to grow.

Why this part earns its pointsThe thread turns from arithmetic to behavior, which is where research shows the plan's real risk.
3

The arithmetic leaves out behavior. When one large employer abruptly ended free coverage and put every worker on a high-deductible plan, Brot-Goldberg et al. (2017) watched what happened next: people reacted to the price they faced at the moment of care, reducing spending by 42 percent while under the deductible. The reductions came from using less care, including care that appeared valuable, not from shopping for cheaper providers. A deductible saves money partly by making people skip care they need. I recognized myself in that finding: two years ago I put off a recommended test for three months because I had not met my deductible, and the problem it found would have been easier to treat earlier.

My recommendation is the high-deductible plan, with two conditions. The family should deposit the $3,200 premium savings into the health savings account each year, so the deductible is funded before care is needed. And they should treat preventive care, which qualifying plans may pay for before the deductible is met, as free, and avoid deferring recommended tests because of cost.

Reply to Andrea

Why this part earns its pointsThe reply accepts the classmate's arithmetic and adds the account's tax treatment, which strengthens her case.
4

Andrea, your comparison of the two plans for your own household was clear and well organized, and I agree with your conclusion that the high-deductible plan saves money for a healthy family. I would strengthen your case with the account's tax treatment, which your thread did not mention. Dalton et al. (2018) explain that health savings account contributions are made before tax, grow tax-free and can be withdrawn tax-free for qualified medical expenses, a triple advantage no other account offers. If your family contributes the $3,000 you calculated as premium savings and sits in the 22 percent federal bracket, the deduction alone is worth about $660 a year before any state tax savings or investment growth. Over ten years, an account funded this way and used only for large expenses could build a meaningful reserve for later medical costs. The one risk I see is the one Brot-Goldberg et al. (2017) identified: under a deductible, people cut back on care, including care that matters. Your thread mentioned that your husband manages a chronic condition with regular lab work. I would check whether the plan treats those tests as preventive or applies them to the deductible, because skipping them to save money would be the wrong kind of saving. If they count toward the deductible, funding the account early in the year matters even more, and a monthly payroll contribution may need to be supplemented with a deposit in January, so the cost never becomes a reason to wait. Have you checked how your plan classifies his lab work, which could change the math for your family considerably, and whether your employer contributes in one lump sum or spreads it through the year?

Reply to Tyler

Why this part earns its pointsThe reply grants the classmate's caution about risk and questions the assumption behind it.
5

Tyler, you recommended the traditional plan because a high deductible would expose your family to large costs in a bad year. That caution makes sense, and your thread was honest about your family's limited savings, but the numbers you presented suggest the risk may be smaller than it seems. Your plan's high-deductible option has an out-of-pocket maximum only $2,000 higher than the traditional plan, while its premium is $2,800 lower, so even in the worst year your family would come out ahead unless the employer contributes nothing to the health savings account. Dalton et al. (2018) note that comparing plans requires looking at total cost under different scenarios, and your heavy-use scenario appears to have left out the premium difference. Where your caution is right is cash flow. A family without savings could face a $3,400 deductible in January before the account has been funded, which is a real hardship. KFF's 2025 survey found the average single-coverage deductible was already $1,886 (KFF, 2025), so high deductibles are now common even in traditional plans, and the question is less whether to accept one than how to prepare for it. One solution is to keep the traditional plan for one year while building the account balance with what would have been premium savings in a separate savings account, then switch. Another is to ask whether the employer front-loads its deposit at the start of the plan year. Either way, the comparison should include the premium difference in every scenario, since it is money the family keeps whether or not anyone gets sick. Would either approach address your concern about a bad year arriving early?

6

References

Brot-Goldberg, Z. C., Chandra, A., Handel, B. R., & Kolstad, J. T. (2017). What does a deductible do? The impact of cost-sharing on health care prices, quantities, and spending dynamics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(3), 1261-1318. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx013

Dalton, M. A., Dalton, J. F., & Langdon, T. P. (2018). Insurance planning. Money Education.

KFF. (2025). 2025 employer health benefits survey. https://www.kff.org/health-costs/report/2025-employer-health-benefits-survey/

What the BUSI 687 Week 3 instructions ask

Forum 2 of BUSI 687 opens in Module/Week 3, when the class reads the health insurance chapter and completes the second end-of-chapter discussion questions. The health insurance thread follows the course's standing rules on length, sources and lived experience, with a Word file attached to the post. Two substantive answers to classmates round out the forum. The forum is worth 25 points. Quiz 2 and the next case-based written assignment arrive a week later along with Forum 3. The guide does not prescribe a particular health plan scenario, so students choose one from work or family; a real employer's plan menu gives the comparison concrete numbers. Posts that use an actual premium share and deductible persuade more than hypothetical ones.

How this BUSI 687 Week 3 example is built

The thread begins with the choice the family faces, two plans offered by one employer, and the facts that frame it from KFF's 2025 survey. A short comparison table shows each plan's annual premium, deductible, out-of-pocket maximum and employer account contribution, and the thread totals what the family would spend in a year of checkups and in a year of hospital bills. It then turns to behavior: Brot-Goldberg and colleagues' natural experiment found that employees moved to a high-deductible plan reduced spending sharply when under the deductible, with no evidence of price shopping. A personal experience with a deferred test supplies the guide's experience requirement. The thread closes with conditions for choosing the plan, and each reply tests a classmate's choice.

BUSI 687 Week 3 grading rubric: where the points go

The health insurance chapter supplies the terms a grader expects to see handled well: deductibles, coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums, the tax treatment and rules of health savings accounts, and the way plan design shifts costs between employer, employee and insurer. A thread that names the plan's actual figures, from premium share to out-of-pocket ceiling, shows the reader the decision instead of describing it. Strong threads compute total expected cost under different usage scenarios instead of comparing premiums alone and recognize how cost-sharing changes behavior. Replies are stronger when they test a classmate's numbers or assumptions with evidence. Laying the two plans' yearly totals next to each other in a table, for a light and a heavy year, lets a reader verify the conclusion quickly.

BUSI 687 Week 3 help: mistakes that cost points

The most frequent Forum 2 error is comparing only premiums and declaring the cheaper plan better. Total the premium and likely out-of-pocket spending for both a quiet year and an expensive one, and include any employer deposit to the health savings account. Use current figures with a source and a year; health costs change annually. Remember that the account only helps if money goes into it. Address behavior, since research shows people cut back on care under a deductible, and say how the family should avoid skipping care it needs. Keep the personal experience brief and relevant, and let the replies test a classmate's cost totals.

Related BUSI 687 sample papers

Other BUSI 687 weeks

More MBA sample papers

BUSI 687 Week 3 questions, answered

What is BUSI 687 Discussion Board Forum 2?

The second of BUSI 687's six discussions, worth 25 points, asks students to weigh health plan choices from chapter 4 against their own experience and then answer two peers.

Where can I find a free BUSI 687 Week 3 sample paper?

Read the full BUSI 687 Week 3 discussion here, deciding whether a family of four should choose a high-deductible health plan with a health savings account.

How much did employer health insurance cost in 2025?

KFF's 2025 survey found average annual premiums of $9,325 for single coverage and $26,993 for family coverage, with an average single-coverage deductible of $1,886 among workers with a general deductible.

Do high-deductible health plans reduce health care spending?

A study of a large employer that moved all workers to a high-deductible plan saw spending drop steeply while people were below their deductibles, mostly because they used less care, some of it worthwhile, not because they found cheaper providers.

What else is due in BUSI 687 Module/Week 3?

Chapter 4's discussion questions from the end of the chapter, another 75 points, share the deadline; the next module brings the second case-based written assignment and the second quiz.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.