BUSI 489 Week 6 Targeted Financial Plan 6 Example

Reviewed by Thomas Kerrigan, MBA, CPA · Liberty University · Updated

This BUSI 489 Week 6 sample paper is Targeted Financial Plan 6, the last of the six targeted sections, and it covers estate planning for the Whitakers, a composite family too small to owe estate tax but with a more urgent problem: two minor children and no wills. The section inventories how each asset would pass at death, by beneficiary designation, joint ownership or will, and finds that an old 401(k) beneficiary form still names Daniel's mother, that a life insurance payout to the children would require a court-supervised guardianship, and that no one has authority to act if either spouse is incapacitated. It recommends wills naming guardians, a testamentary trust for the children, updated beneficiary forms, powers of attorney and health care directives, and a letter of instruction. It is worth 100 points in Liberty University's BUSI 489, a BS in Business Administration capstone.

CourseBUSI 489 Capstone in Financial Planning (BUSI489)
Module/Week6
AssignmentTargeted Financial Plan 6
Paper typeTargeted financial plan section (estate planning)
Lengthabout 653 words, 2 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: a targeted financial plan section for a hypothetical case client covering one or more planning content areas, prepared to be combined into the Comprehensive Financial Plan
FormatAPA 7 student paper
Points100
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBS in Business Administration
Where it sitsModule/Week 6 in Liberty's published BUSI 489 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BUSI 489 Week 6

1

Targeted Financial Plan 6: Estate Planning for the Whitaker Household

 

[Student Name]

School of Business, Liberty University

BUSI 489: Capstone in Financial Planning

Targeted Financial Plan 6

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

 

The Whitaker household is a composite client standing in for the textbook's hypothetical case, which is not public; legal points are general planning guidance to be confirmed with an attorney in the clients' state, the research and the Scripture cited are real, and the structure follows Liberty's public course guide for BUSI 489.

2

Targeted Financial Plan 6: Estate Planning for the Whitaker Household

Goals

Why this part earns its pointsThe goals put the children's care first, which explains why the plan focuses on guardianship and trusts rather than taxes.
3

The Whitakers' estate planning goals are simple and serious: if both parents died, their children should be raised by Grace's sister and her husband, the children's financial needs should be met until adulthood and through college, and the money should not pass to the children outright at 18. If one spouse became incapacitated, the other should be able to manage finances and medical decisions without court involvement. Their estate, roughly $368,000 in net worth plus life insurance, is far below the federal estate tax exemption, and Virginia has no estate tax, so taxes are not a concern.

How Each Asset Would Pass

AssetValueHow it passesProblem found
Home$420,000Joint tenancy with right of survivorshipNone while either spouse lives
Checking and savings$25,500Joint accountsNone while either spouse lives
Brokerage account$25,000Daniel's name alonePasses by will; no will exists
Daniel's 401(k)$142,000Beneficiary designationNames Daniel's mother, from before the marriage
Grace's IRA$28,000Beneficiary designationNames Daniel; no contingent beneficiary
Life insurance on Daniel, current and recommended$968,000Beneficiary designationsContingent beneficiaries are the minor children
529 plans$18,000Account owner designationNo successor owner named

Analysis

Why this part earns its pointsEach problem is explained in terms of what would actually happen, which motivates action.
4

Three problems stand out. First, Daniel's 401(k) still names his mother, from a form completed before his marriage. Retirement accounts pass by beneficiary form regardless of what a will says, so if Daniel died today, $142,000 meant for his family would go to his mother. Federal law for workplace plans generally gives a spouse rights to a 401(k), but relying on that protection is not a plan, and the form should simply be corrected.

Second, the life insurance names the minor children as contingent beneficiaries. If both parents died, minors cannot take legal control of a large payout, so a judge would probably name someone to hold and manage the funds under the court's oversight, with costs and reporting, and each child would receive the remainder outright at 18. An 18-year-old inheriting several hundred thousand dollars with no structure is the outcome most parents fear and few plans prevent.

Third, without powers of attorney and health care directives, if Daniel or Grace were incapacitated by an accident, the other might need a court-appointed guardianship or conservatorship to manage accounts in the incapacitated spouse's name or make some medical decisions.

Recommendations

  • Wills for both spouses, naming Grace's sister and her husband as guardians of the children and creating a testamentary trust for the children.
  • Name the trust as contingent beneficiary of all life insurance and retirement accounts, with each spouse as primary beneficiary of the other's.
  • Correct Daniel's 401(k) beneficiary form now, and add contingent beneficiaries to Grace's IRA.
  • Have the trust distribute for health, education and support, with the remainder paid in stages, such as one-third at 25, one-third at 30 and the rest at 35.
  • For each spouse, a durable financial power of attorney and a medical directive that appoints someone to make health decisions if the spouse cannot.
  • Name a successor owner for each 529 plan.
  • A letter of instruction listing accounts, passwords stored securely, wishes for the children's upbringing and funeral preferences.

Grable et al. (2012) and Lytton et al. (2012) stress that documents must be drafted by an attorney licensed in the clients' state, and the plan's role is to identify needs and coordinate them with the rest of the plan. The estimated cost of the documents, about $2,500, can be paid from the emergency fund build-up once the credit cards are cleared.

Why this part earns its pointsThe fairness discussion answers a question clients often ask but plans rarely address.
5

Treating the Children Fairly

The Whitakers asked whether the trust should treat their children equally if one later needs more help. McGarry (1999) found that parents' gifts during life tended to go more to children with lower incomes, while their intended bequests were usually divided equally. The trust can allow for both: equal shares at the end, with the trustee permitted to make unequal distributions for a child's special needs during the trust's term.

A Christian Perspective

Proverbs 13:22 commends the good person who leaves an inheritance to his grandchildren (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016). For a young family, the most valuable part of that inheritance is not money but care: naming who will raise the children and ensuring that what is left for them is managed wisely. Estate planning is an act of love that spares a grieving family from decisions made in court. It also gives the Whitakers a chance to consider whether part of their estate should support the church and causes they give to now, so that their generosity continues beyond their lives.

6

References

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

Grable, J. E., Klock, D. D., & Lytton, R. H. (2012). The case approach to financial planning: Bridging the gap between theory and practice (2nd ed.). The National Underwriter Company.

Lytton, R. H., Grable, J. E., & Klock, D. D. (2012). The process of financial planning: Developing a financial plan (2nd ed.). The National Underwriter Company.

McGarry, K. (1999). Inter vivos transfers and intended bequests. Journal of Public Economics, 73(3), 321-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00017-1

What the BUSI 489 Week 6 instructions ask

The sixth week of BUSI 489 assigns Grable et al.'s thirteenth chapter, revisits chapter 15 and adds one presentation, and brings Mini-Case Assignment 5 and Targeted Financial Plan 6, worth 100 points. This last targeted plan completes the set of six sections that, revised and combined, become the Comprehensive Financial Plan due in Week 8. Estate planning draws on every earlier section: the assets in the balance sheet, the life insurance recommended for the family, the retirement accounts and their beneficiary forms, and the goals the clients set for their children. A strong section therefore reviews how each asset would actually transfer, not only whether a will exists.

How this BUSI 489 Week 6 example is built

The section opens with the clients' estate planning goals, centered on their children's care. A table follows every asset and shows how it would pass at death, by beneficiary designation, joint ownership with survivorship or will, and flags the problems found. The analysis explains each problem in plain terms: the outdated beneficiary, the risk of a court-controlled guardianship of property for minor children and the lack of authority during incapacity. Recommendations name each document and its purpose. A short discussion of fairness between the two children applies research on how parents divide gifts and bequests, and Scripture frames the section's purpose.

BUSI 489 Week 6 grading rubric: where the points go

Estate planning sections are graded on whether the transfer of each asset is analyzed correctly, whether problems are identified and explained, whether recommended documents fit the clients' goals and family situation, and whether the section connects to the insurance and retirement sections. Instructors look for terms such as probate, beneficiary designation, joint tenancy with right of survivorship, testamentary trust, guardian of the person and of the property, durable power of attorney and advance directive used correctly. Noting that legal details vary by state and that an attorney must draft the documents shows professional judgment. A section that only states that the clients need wills, without the asset analysis, earns less. Clarity helps the client act.

BUSI 489 Week 6 help: mistakes that cost points

List every asset and ask how it would pass at death: by beneficiary form, by title or by will. Check each beneficiary designation against the clients' current wishes; outdated forms are among the most common and costly errors. For families with minor children, address both guardianship and how money left to the children will be managed. Include incapacity documents, not only death documents. Explain why each document matters in a sentence the client would understand. Note where state law matters and recommend an attorney. Connect the section to the life insurance and retirement sections so that beneficiary designations and the trust work together. Review the documents every five years or after any birth, death, marriage or move.

Related BUSI 489 sample papers

Other BUSI 489 weeks

More BS in Business Administration sample papers

BUSI 489 Week 6 questions, answered

What is BUSI 489 Targeted Financial Plan 6?

The sixth and last 100-point targeted plan section, due in Module/Week 6, which in this sample covers estate planning for the case household and its minor children.

Where can I find a free BUSI 489 Week 6 sample paper?

The page holds a full BUSI 489 Week 6 estate planning section, with an asset transfer table, the problems found and the documents recommended.

Why do parents of minor children need a will?

A will lets parents name the guardian who would raise their children and set up a trust to manage money left to them, instead of leaving both decisions to a court.

How do beneficiary designations affect an estate plan?

Retirement accounts and life insurance pass to the beneficiaries named on their forms regardless of what a will says, so outdated forms can send money to the wrong people.

What else is due in BUSI 489 Module/Week 6?

Mini-Case Assignment 5, one more brief textbook problem worth 25 points, completed in the same week as the estate reading and its presentation.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.