BUSI 354 Week 4 Discussion Board Forum 4 Example

Reviewed by Thomas Kerrigan, MBA, CPA · Liberty University · Updated

This BUSI 354 Week 4 sample forum answers the gifting prompt by weighing lifetime gifts against bequests at death. The thread explains the annual exclusion and the unified lifetime exemption from Dalton and Langdon's chapters, then argues that with the federal exemption at $15 million per person for 2026, most families should decide on gifts by non-tax reasons and by the income tax basis rules rather than by gift tax savings. Research on how wealthy families time transfers in response to taxes, and on how many fail to use the annual exclusion, supports the analysis, and Paul's reminder that it is more blessed to give than to receive gives the Scripture. The reply cautions a classmate about gifting low-basis stock. Trusts are the subject of this 50-point Forum 4 post and reply in Liberty University BUSI 354 for the BS in Business Administration.

CourseBUSI 354 Estate Planning (BUSI354)
Module/Week4
AssignmentDiscussion Board Forum 4
Paper typeDiscussion thread with one reply
Lengthabout 576 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a thread that elaborates on the textbook material and analyzes the question posed in the prompt, plus a reply to a classmate's thread
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points50
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBS in Business Administration
Where it sitsModule/Week 4 in Liberty's published BUSI 354 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BUSI 354 Week 4

1

Discussion Board Forum 4: Gifting and the Gift Tax

BUSI 354 Estate Planning, Discussion Board Forum 4 Thread and Reply

Thread by [Student Name]

The forum prompt and the classmate's thread are composites; the textbook, research and Scripture cited are real, and the exclusion amounts are the federal figures in effect for 2026.

Why this part earns its pointsThe thread separates the three taxes a gift touches, which is where most gifting mistakes begin.
2

For most families today, the decision to give during life rather than at death should rest on non-tax reasons and on the income tax basis rules, not on transfer tax savings.

Dalton and Langdon (2017) explain that a gift can affect three taxes. The gift tax applies to transfers during life, but the annual exclusion, $19,000 per recipient for 2026, removes most family gifts from it entirely, and larger gifts simply use part of the unified lifetime exemption. The estate tax applies at death against the same exemption, which federal law set at $15 million per person for 2026. And the income tax determines what heirs owe when they sell: property received as a gift keeps the giver's basis, while property inherited at death generally receives a basis stepped up to its value at that time.

Transfer taxes once shaped wealthy families' choices strongly. Joulfaian (2005) found that the timing of transfers between gifts and bequests responded to their relative tax costs, with gifts rising when they were tax-favored. Poterba (2001), however, found that many households wealthy enough to benefit did not make full use of the annual exclusion, leaving tax savings unclaimed. If even the wealthy underuse a simple tax break, emotion and control clearly matter as much as tax rates in decisions about giving.

With today's exemption, few clients face estate tax at all. That shifts the analysis to basis: gifting a highly appreciated asset can cost an heir far more in capital gains tax than any transfer tax saved, while gifting cash or high-basis assets avoids that problem. The exceptions are families whose estates may exceed the exemption, for whom removing future growth still matters, and clients who expect to need long-term care, where gifts may affect Medicaid eligibility under the look-back rules and need careful timing.

There are good non-tax reasons to give while living. Paul reminded the Ephesian elders of the Lord's words that it is more blessed to give than to receive (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Acts 20:35). A parent who helps a child with a first home sees the gift used and can guide it, and the child receives help when it matters most rather than in late middle age, which is when many inheritances now arrive. The best plan gives cash and high-basis assets during life, within the giver's own security, and holds appreciated property until death.

Reply to Jasmine

Why this part earns its pointsThe reply applies the basis rule to the classmate's specific plan.
3

Jasmine, your thread suggested that clients give appreciated stock to their children now, so the future growth escapes estate tax. That logic made sense when exemptions were low, and Dalton and Langdon (2017) present removing appreciation from the estate as a classic gifting goal.

For most clients today, though, the basis rules point the other way. Stock bought for $20,000 and now worth $200,000 carries the $20,000 basis to a child who receives it as a gift, so a sale would trigger tax on $180,000 of gain. If the child inherits it instead, the basis generally steps up to $200,000 and the gain largely disappears. Unless the client's estate exceeds the exemption, holding the stock and giving cash may be better. If the client wants to reduce a concentrated position, giving some shares to a charity instead avoids the gain entirely.

Proverbs urges us to do good to those who are owed it whenever doing so lies within our power (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Proverbs 3:27). Could the client give cash now and keep the stock for the step-up?

4

References

Dalton, M. A., & Langdon, T. P. (2017). Estate planning (8th ed.). Money Education.

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

Joulfaian, D. (2005). Choosing between gifts and bequests: How taxes affect the timing of wealth transfers. Journal of Public Economics, 89(11-12), 2069-2091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.11.005

Poterba, J. (2001). Estate and gift taxes and incentives for inter vivos giving in the US. Journal of Public Economics, 79(1), 237-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00102-X

What the BUSI 354 Week 4 instructions ask

Chapters 6 and 7 of Dalton and Langdon, on gifting and the gift tax, and pages 447 to 450 of chapter 11 are the readings for Module/Week 4, with a presentation, Quiz 4 and Forum 4. The forum follows the course pattern of elaborating on the textbook's material, analyzing a question it raises and replying to one classmate's thread. Because the course guide names no length or source count, the sample gives a full thread of several paragraphs, citing the textbook, a study and Scripture, plus a reply near two hundred words. Thread and reply together earn 50 points. Gifting questions mix gift tax, estate tax and income tax rules, so careful threads keep the three taxes distinct.

How this BUSI 354 Week 4 example is built

The thread separates the three taxes a gift touches, gift, estate and income, and shows that for most families only the third matters today. It explains the annual exclusion and the unified exemption with Dalton and Langdon's terms and current figures. Two studies then show how wealthy families respond to transfer taxes, one on the timing of gifts and bequests and one on underuse of the annual exclusion. Acts supplies the biblical case for giving while living. The recommendation turns on the basis rules, which favor holding appreciated assets until death. The reply applies that rule to a classmate's plan to give appreciated stock.

BUSI 354 Week 4 grading rubric: where the points go

The thread is graded on its elaboration of the gifting chapters and its analysis of the question, and the reply on what it adds. Accurate figures and rules, the annual exclusion, the unified credit, the marital and charitable deductions and the carryover basis of gifts, show command of the reading. Analysis appears in weighing tradeoffs for a particular kind of client rather than listing benefits of gifting. Research on how people actually make transfers strengthens the argument. The reply earns credit for identifying a consequence the classmate missed, such as the loss of a basis step-up. APA citations and fitting use of Scripture complete the post.

BUSI 354 Week 4 help: mistakes that cost points

Separate the gift tax, the estate tax and the income tax effects of a gift before deciding whether it makes sense. Use the current year's annual exclusion and lifetime exemption, since both are indexed and recent law changed the exemption. Compare carryover basis for gifts with the step-up at death. Look for economics research on how taxes affect gifts and bequests. Consider non-tax reasons to give, such as seeing heirs use the gift, and non-tax reasons to wait, such as the giver's own security. Choose Scripture about giving and connect it to the timing question. Test the classmate's gift for basis problems in your reply. Name the current year's exclusion figures in the post, since they change annually.

Related BUSI 354 sample papers

Other BUSI 354 weeks

More BS in Business Administration sample papers

BUSI 354 Week 4 questions, answered

What is BUSI 354 Discussion Board Forum 4 about?

It goes with the gifting and gift tax chapters in Module/Week 4, so threads analyze lifetime gifts, the annual exclusion and the unified exemption, followed by a reply to a classmate.

Where can I find a free BUSI 354 Week 4 sample paper?

The sample below is a complete BUSI 354 Week 4 forum thread weighing lifetime gifts against bequests, with a reply on gifting appreciated stock.

What is the gift tax annual exclusion for 2026?

The annual exclusion is $19,000 per recipient for 2026, so spouses who split gifts can transfer $38,000 a year to each person without touching their lifetime exemption.

Is it better to give appreciated assets now or leave them at death?

For income tax reasons it is often better to leave them at death, since heirs generally receive a stepped-up basis, while a gift carries over the giver's original basis.

What else is due in BUSI 354 Module/Week 4?

Quiz 4 accompanies the forum, following chapters 6 and 7 and pages 447 to 450 of chapter 11 in Dalton and Langdon, plus one presentation.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.