| Course | ACCT 302 Intermediate Financial Accounting II (ACCT302) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 2 |
| Assignment | Research Paper Topic |
| Paper type | Research paper topic proposal |
| Length | about 502 words, 2 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: a research paper topic submitted ahead of the 8-10 page paper on managerial accounting theory, which needs at least 5 scholarly resources in current APA format |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| Points | 0 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | BS in Accounting |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 2 in Liberty's published ACCT 302 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for ACCT 302 Week 2
Topic Proposal: Did Putting Leases on the Balance Sheet Change How Managers Decide to Lease?
[Student Name]
School of Business, Liberty University
ACCT 302: Intermediate Financial Accounting II
Research Paper Topic
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The proposal is written as a student would submit it for approval; the textbook and every scholarly source listed are real.
Topic Proposal: Did Putting Leases on the Balance Sheet Change How Managers Decide to Lease?
Working Title and Topic
Working title: Did ASC 842 Change How Managers Decide to Lease? Spiceland et al. (2018) explain that, under the new lease standard, any lease running beyond a year now puts two items on the lessee's books, the obligation to pay and the asset it may use, ending the long-standing practice of leaving operating leases in the notes. Operating lease expense still appears on the income statement as a single straight-line cost, but the obligation now sits beside bonds and notes payable. For many retailers, airlines and restaurant chains, reported liabilities rose substantially when the standard took effect in 2019.
Research Question
Did the requirement to recognize operating leases on the balance sheet change managers' decisions about whether, how and on what terms to lease assets, or did it change only how existing leases are reported?
Significance for Managerial Accounting
Managerial accounting teaches that decisions should rest on relevant future cash flows, and the lease-or-buy decision is a standard capital budgeting problem. In theory, moving a lease from the notes to the balance sheet changes no cash flow and should change no decision. In practice, managers are evaluated on ratios and return measures, and debt covenants and bonus plans are often written in accounting numbers. If a reporting rule changes what managers choose, then the accounting has become part of the economics, and that is a managerial accounting question. Eaton et al. (2021) found evidence that leasing has served as a channel through which managers over-invest, which suggests that how leases are measured affects the discipline applied to them.
How the Evidence Will Be Gathered
The paper will combine three bodies of research. Theory on why firms lease, especially Eisfeldt and Rampini's (2009) argument that leasing gives financially constrained firms more debt capacity because lessors can repossess assets easily, will explain the economic reasons for leasing that the standard should not disturb. Research on managers' incentives will show why reported numbers can still matter. Studies of the period after the standards took effect will test whether behavior changed, including Heese et al. (2025) on the shift toward variable lease payments that ASC 842 leaves off the balance sheet, Kusano and Yamashita (2026) on loan spreads after lease recognition in Japan and Zhou and Fan (2025) on uncertainty arising from new book-tax differences.
Planned Outline
The paper will cover the economics of the lease-or-buy decision, the change from the old to the new lease model, managers' incentives tied to reported numbers, evidence on how lease contracts and lending changed after adoption and implications for managers who make leasing decisions.
Preliminary Resources
Eisfeldt and Rampini (2009) on leasing and debt capacity; Eaton et al. (2021) on leasing and managers' investment decisions; Heese et al. (2025) on variable leases under ASC 842; Kusano and Yamashita (2026) on loan spreads after IFRS 16; Zhou and Fan (2025) on ASC 842, book-tax differences and market uncertainty; and Spiceland et al. (2018) for the accounting itself.
Scope
U.S. lessees will be the subject, in the years since 2019, with the Japanese evidence used only as a comparison, without attempting a full survey of international lease accounting.
References
Eaton, T. V., Nichols, C., Wahlen, J., & Wieland, M. (2021). Managers' investment decisions: Incentives and economic consequences arising from leases. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(4), Article 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14040165
Eisfeldt, A. L., & Rampini, A. A. (2009). Leasing, ability to repossess, and debt capacity. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(4), 1621-1657. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn026
Heese, J., Shin, A., & Wang, C. C. Y. (2025). Variable leases under ASC 842: First evidence on properties and consequences. Review of Accounting Studies, 30(3), 2218-2263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-025-09899-z
Kusano, M., & Yamashita, T. (2026). Does recognizing operating leases influence loan spreads? Evidence from Japan. Journal of International Accounting Research, 25(2), 83-106. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-2024-015
Spiceland, J. D., Nelson, M. W., & Thomas, W. B. (2018). Intermediate accounting (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Zhou, Y., & Fan, S. (2025). Lease accounting standard (ASC 842), temporary book-tax differences, and capital market uncertainty. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 36(4), 108-126. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22794
What the ACCT 302 Week 2 instructions ask
ACCT 302 wants the research topic by the end of Module/Week 2, when students are also reading chapter 17 of Spiceland et al. on pensions and other postretirement benefits, a presentation, Connect Homework 2 and the first Connect quiz. The submission carries no points of its own; its job is to secure approval for the paper due in Module/Week 7. According to the syllabus, the finished paper must address a topic related to managerial accounting theories, fill eight to ten double-spaced pages, APA style current, and draw on at least five scholarly resources. A proposal that names the theory, states the research question and shows the resources already exist gives the instructor everything needed to approve it.
How this ACCT 302 Week 2 example is built
The proposal opens with a working title and a paragraph on the lease standard, then states its research question about managers' leasing decisions. A significance paragraph explains why the question is managerial rather than purely financial: if a reporting rule changes what managers choose to do, accounting is shaping operations. An evidence plan sorts the sources into theory on why firms lease, research on managers' incentives and studies of what happened after the standards took effect. A planned outline, a list of six resources and a scope paragraph limiting the paper to U.S. lessees after 2019 complete it, with one international study kept as a comparison.
ACCT 302 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go
Topic submissions in ACCT 302 earn no points but control the paper that earns 100, so the instructor reads them for fit, focus and feasibility. Fit means the topic connects to managerial accounting theory as the syllabus requires, not just to a financial reporting rule. Focus means one research question that eight to ten pages can answer. Feasibility means at least five scholarly resources exist and the student has found them. Proposals that state a question, name the theory and list sources in APA form tend to be approved as written; vague topics such as "leases" or "pensions" are often returned with a request to narrow them.
ACCT 302 Week 2 help: mistakes that cost points
The usual trouble with this submission is choosing a financial reporting topic that never touches managerial accounting, which the ACCT 302 syllabus specifically asks for. Bridge the two by asking how a reporting rule changes decisions, budgets, performance measures or compensation. Run a library search before committing, and keep the five or six best articles you find. Write the research question as a single sentence ending in a question mark. List your resources in APA format even though the proposal is ungraded, since the final paper will need them anyway. Mention any limits, such as industry or years, so the instructor can see the paper fits ten pages, and save the instructor's comments for Module/Week 7.
Related ACCT 302 sample papers
Other ACCT 302 weeks
- ACCT 302 Week 1: Group Discussion Board Forum 1
- ACCT 302 Week 3: Group Discussion Board Forum 2
- ACCT 302 Week 5: Group Discussion Board Forum 3
- ACCT 302 Week 7: Research Paper
More BS in Accounting sample papers
- ACCT 212 Week 5: Faith Integration Project
- ACCT 301 Week 2: Research Paper Topic
- ACCT 311 Week 1: Group Discussion Board Forum 1
- ACCT 332 Week 2: Topic, Abstract and Bibliography
ACCT 302 Week 2 questions, answered
What is the ACCT 302 Research Paper Topic?
An ungraded Module/Week 2 submission proposing the topic of the 8-10 page research paper on managerial accounting theory, due in Module/Week 7.
Where can I find a free ACCT 302 Week 2 sample paper?
Above is a full ACCT 302 Week 2 topic proposal on how the lease standard affected managers' lease-or-buy choices, with six scholarly resources.
What counts as a managerial accounting theory topic?
A question about how accounting information shapes internal decisions, such as capital budgeting, lease-or-buy choices, performance evaluation, budgeting behavior or incentive compensation.
How many sources does the ACCT 302 research paper need?
Five scholarly resources is the floor the syllabus sets, for a paper running eight to ten pages in current APA style; stronger papers usually draw on six to eight so that the evidence can be compared.
What is due in ACCT 302 Module/Week 2?
Chapter 17 of Spiceland et al. on pensions with its slides, the week's Connect set and the first Connect quiz, a 30-question open-book quiz, all arrive with the ungraded research topic.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom ACCT 302 Week 2 sample · All ACCT 302 weeks · All courses